Bone mineral density differs by proximal femoral fracture location but not by fracture morphology

Abstract Whether the morphology of proximal femoral fractures reflects skeletal fragility remains unclear. Using a prospective multicenter registry of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture at six Japanese hospitals between 2023 and 2026, we compared bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers across fracture locations and morphological subtypes. Femoral neck fractures were classified by the Garden classification and trochanteric fractures by the AO/OTA classification, with 31A2 fractures subdivided by fragment number on computed tomography. Of 1,724 patients analyzed (866 femoral neck and 858 trochanteric fractures), those with trochanteric fractures had lower BMD at the total hip (adjusted difference − 0.053 g/cm², 95% confidence interval − 0.067 to − 0.040), femoral neck, and lumbar spine (all P < 0.001). Within fracture types, total hip BMD did not differ between displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures (− 0.007, − 0.032 to 0.017), and more fragments were not associated with lower BMD in trochanteric fractures. Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide was higher in trochanteric fractures, whereas tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b and 25-hydroxyvitamin D did not differ. BMD was associated with fracture location but not with fracture morphology, suggesting that fracture type does not necessarily reflect the severity of osteoporosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11279780/v1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Bone mineral density differs by proximal femoral fracture location but not by fracture morphology

Norimasa Iwasaki, Shunichi Yokota, Shun Shimodan, Hotaka Ishizu et al.
Research Square
Bone health and osteoporosis research
preprint

Bone mineral density differs by proximal femoral fracture location but not by fracture morphology

Norimasa Iwasaki, Shunichi Yokota, Shun Shimodan, Hotaka Ishizu, Tetsuro Oue, Yoshio Nishida, Yusuke Ohashi, Hiroya Hashizume, Kosuke Arita, Tomohiro Shimizu, Shu Yamazaki, Kenichi Kusunoki
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Whether the morphology of proximal femoral fractures reflects skeletal fragility remains unclear. Using a prospective multicenter registry of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture at six Japanese hospitals between 2023 and 2026, we compared bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers across fracture locations and morphological subtypes. Femoral neck fractures were classified by the Garden classification and trochanteric fractures by the AO/OTA classification, with 31A2 fractures subdivided by fragment number on computed tomography. Of 1,724 patients analyzed (866 femoral neck and 858 trochanteric fractures), those with trochanteric fractures had lower BMD at the total hip (adjusted difference − 0.053 g/cm², 95% confidence interval − 0.067 to − 0.040), femoral neck, and lumbar spine (all P < 0.001). Within fracture types, total hip BMD did not differ between displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures (− 0.007, − 0.032 to 0.017), and more fragments were not associated with lower BMD in trochanteric fractures. Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide was higher in trochanteric fractures, whereas tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b and 25-hydroxyvitamin D did not differ. BMD was associated with fracture location but not with fracture morphology, suggesting that fracture type does not necessarily reflect the severity of osteoporosis.

Research Square
Hokkaido University (JP), Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital (JP), Kushiro City General Hospital (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Good health and well-being
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon