Associations Between Psychological Factors, Routine Hematological and Biochemical Indicators, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among University Students: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major mental health concern among university students. Although psychological risk factors for NSSI have been extensively studied, the potential contribution of routinely available hematological and biochemical indicators remains unclear. This study examined their associations with NSSI and their incremental value beyond psychological factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1,661 university students who completed campus psychological screening and routine health examinations. NSSI status was defined as an NSSI total score greater than zero. Psychological variables included depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep problems, impulsivity, attentional control, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and problematic internet use. Associations between routine indicators and NSSI severity were examined using Spearman correlations, while logistic regression models evaluated associations with NSSI status after adjustment for demographic and psychological factors. Five-fold cross-validation was used to compare predictive performance across demographic, routine indicator, psychological, and combined models. Results: Among the 1,661 participants, 244 (14.69%) were classified as having NSSI. Several routine indicators, including AST, ALT, red blood cell count, uric acid, hemoglobin, and hematocrit, showed weak correlations with NSSI total scores after FDR correction. However, no routine hematological or biochemical indicator remained significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction in either adjusted logistic regression model. The psychological model showed substantially better predictive performance than demographic or routine indicator models, and adding routine indicators did not improve prediction (AUC: 0.796 vs. 0.787). Conclusion: Routine hematological and biochemical indicators showed weak associations with NSSI severity but provided limited incremental value beyond psychological factors for identifying NSSI among university students. Psychological assessment remains an important component of NSSI screening, whereas routine laboratory data did not show additional incremental value in this sample. Keywords: non-suicidal self-injury, university students, hematological indicators, biochemical indicators, psychological screening, predictive modeling

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s647931
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Psychological Factors, Routine Hematological and Biochemical Indicators, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among University Students: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Jianqin Cao, Han Yue, Jiahan Chen, Yuyan Wang et al.
1 links
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Associations Between Psychological Factors, Routine Hematological and Biochemical Indicators, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among University Students: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Jianqin Cao, Han Yue, Jiahan Chen, Yuyan Wang, Yuting Sun, Junzhu Liu, Yue Du, Xilin Yang, Jing Lv, Huiying Qin, Dantong Yao, Xinming Liu, Na Li, Ruohan Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major mental health concern among university students. Although psychological risk factors for NSSI have been extensively studied, the potential contribution of routinely available hematological and biochemical indicators remains unclear. This study examined their associations with NSSI and their incremental value beyond psychological factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1,661 university students who completed campus psychological screening and routine health examinations. NSSI status was defined as an NSSI total score greater than zero. Psychological variables included depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep problems, impulsivity, attentional control, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and problematic internet use. Associations between routine indicators and NSSI severity were examined using Spearman correlations, while logistic regression models evaluated associations with NSSI status after adjustment for demographic and psychological factors. Five-fold cross-validation was used to compare predictive performance across demographic, routine indicator, psychological, and combined models. Results: Among the 1,661 participants, 244 (14.69%) were classified as having NSSI. Several routine indicators, including AST, ALT, red blood cell count, uric acid, hemoglobin, and hematocrit, showed weak correlations with NSSI total scores after FDR correction. However, no routine hematological or biochemical indicator remained significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction in either adjusted logistic regression model. The psychological model showed substantially better predictive performance than demographic or routine indicator models, and adding routine indicators did not improve prediction (AUC: 0.796 vs. 0.787). Conclusion: Routine hematological and biochemical indicators showed weak associations with NSSI severity but provided limited incremental value beyond psychological factors for identifying NSSI among university students. Psychological assessment remains an important component of NSSI screening, whereas routine laboratory data did not show additional incremental value in this sample. Keywords: non-suicidal self-injury, university students, hematological indicators, biochemical indicators, psychological screening, predictive modeling

Psychology Research and Behavior ManagementVol. Volume 19
Harbin Medical University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon