Frailty in older people: rehabilitation treatment research examining separate settings Plus (FORTRESS Plus): Results of a single-arm intervention study with comparison to historical controls

Abstract Background Frail older adults hospitalised with acute illness are at high risk of functional decline, yet few receive intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation during admission or after discharge. FORTRESS Plus was a single-arm study of a multicomponent frailty intervention comprising comprehensive geriatric assessment, pharmacy review, dietetic support, and up to seven weekly supervised home-based exercise sessions after discharge, compared with historical controls from the FORTRESS study, whose post-discharge support was limited to one to two home visits and weekly telephone calls. Methods 141 participants were recruited from three wards at Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between October 2023 and July 2024. The primary analysis compared 118 FORTRESS Plus participants meeting FORTRESS eligibility criteria (age ≥ 75, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24) with 110 FORTRESS historical controls. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) was assessed at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included physical function, mood, readmissions, social support, and medication burden. Results Compared with historical controls, FORTRESS Plus participants had higher adjusted EQ-5D-5L index scores at 4 months (difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and 12 months (difference 0.24, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.35; time-by-study interaction p < 0.0001 at both times). An average treatment effect of 0.17 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.34) was estimated after assigning an EQ-5D-5L index value of − 1 to participants who died before 12 months. Within FORTRESS Plus, physical function and mood improved: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores increased by 1.71 points at 4 months and 2.47 points at 12 months, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) scores decreased by 1.10 and 1.87 points, respectively (all p < 0.05). Readmissions did not differ significantly between studies. Conclusion The more intensive multicomponent intervention in FORTRESS Plus was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life compared with the less intensive FORTRESS intervention. Physical function and mood also improved within FORTRESS Plus. Trial Registration : The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00649) and received site-specific governance approval (2023/STE01740). Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12623001103651, registered 20 October 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11247663/v1
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Frailty in older people: rehabilitation treatment research examining separate settings Plus (FORTRESS Plus): Results of a single-arm intervention study with comparison to historical controls

Annette Kifley, Joanna Murray, Susan E Kurrle, Christopher Papic et al.
2 links
Research Square
Frailty in Older Adults
preprint

Frailty in older people: rehabilitation treatment research examining separate settings Plus (FORTRESS Plus): Results of a single-arm intervention study with comparison to historical controls

Annette Kifley, Joanna Murray, Susan E Kurrle, Christopher Papic, Ian Douglas Cameron, Rosanna Tran
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Frail older adults hospitalised with acute illness are at high risk of functional decline, yet few receive intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation during admission or after discharge. FORTRESS Plus was a single-arm study of a multicomponent frailty intervention comprising comprehensive geriatric assessment, pharmacy review, dietetic support, and up to seven weekly supervised home-based exercise sessions after discharge, compared with historical controls from the FORTRESS study, whose post-discharge support was limited to one to two home visits and weekly telephone calls. Methods 141 participants were recruited from three wards at Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between October 2023 and July 2024. The primary analysis compared 118 FORTRESS Plus participants meeting FORTRESS eligibility criteria (age ≥ 75, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24) with 110 FORTRESS historical controls. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) was assessed at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included physical function, mood, readmissions, social support, and medication burden. Results Compared with historical controls, FORTRESS Plus participants had higher adjusted EQ-5D-5L index scores at 4 months (difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and 12 months (difference 0.24, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.35; time-by-study interaction p < 0.0001 at both times). An average treatment effect of 0.17 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.34) was estimated after assigning an EQ-5D-5L index value of − 1 to participants who died before 12 months. Within FORTRESS Plus, physical function and mood improved: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores increased by 1.71 points at 4 months and 2.47 points at 12 months, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) scores decreased by 1.10 and 1.87 points, respectively (all p < 0.05). Readmissions did not differ significantly between studies. Conclusion The more intensive multicomponent intervention in FORTRESS Plus was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life compared with the less intensive FORTRESS intervention. Physical function and mood also improved within FORTRESS Plus. Trial Registration : The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00649) and received site-specific governance approval (2023/STE01740). Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12623001103651, registered 20 October 2023.

Research Square
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Good health and well-being
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon