TDF × the black hole — thirty-seven intersection probes, judged honestly

Thirty-seven proposed intersections between the Temporal Dynamics Framework (TDF) and black-hole physics — fifteen in the first sweep (§2), fifteen more in the closing sweep (§5), five in round four (§7), the internal-consistency item (§7.5), and the mass-defect prediction test (§7.6) — each probed under the corpus's one rule: seen stays seen, unknown stays unknown, and anything that does not survive is written down as a null-fail, not dropped. The numerical probes were tested against a chance baseline — the only honest way to tell a real numerical relationship from the near-misses you can always manufacture from a rich set of constants. The result is mostly negative, and that is the point: most of these intersections are null-fails or out-of-domain, and stating so cleanly is worth more to the corpus than silence. Two genuine fault lines were named as worth resolving — an internal-consistency check between two TDF mass routes, and the area-law entropy of black holes versus any volumetric picture of nested structure. The first stands at §7.5: the "two routes" are one object — the second is the first re-encoded through its own base- logarithm, so their agreement is an algebraic identity, and the corpus takes no forced internal result from it. Both fault lines therefore remain open. This record holds one paper on its own and is refreshed every couple of months. The complete deposit, 10.5281/zenodo.21788037, holds every paper with its code and data and is updated first; for the newest version of this paper, go there.