Conditional Returns to Language Adaptation: An Adaptation Ladder Study of Indonesian Short Answer Grading

Indonesian has several adapted language models for automatic short answer grading. Studies disagree about whether specialization is worthwhile; each test one point on the adaptation spectrum, so a losing language-specific model is indistinguishable from useless specialization. An ordinal comparison replaces it: a three-rung ladder of released checkpoints, from no Indonesian adaptation through regional to national continued pretraining, in two families whose rungs share a base model and parameter count. In the Gemma family, the first two rungs are siblings rather than ancestor and descendant, which the analysis carries through. Across 30,960 grading calls on 36 independent questions, with the question as the unit of inference, returns are conditional rather than cumulative. Regional adaptation helps both families, by 0.029 and 0.018 pooled quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). The second step adds little on the weaker base, 0.016, and harms the stronger one, −0.029. That decline is established in one family and directional in the other. Labelled examples drawn from the question being graded halve the remaining advantage, and examples from other questions attenuate it further, from +0.069 to +0.005, a difference of −0.064 [−0.107, −0.022], although they grade less accurately in absolute terms. Spreading the demonstrated score levels reduces it to +0.029. All six models moved in the direction predicted from their initial scoring bias at four shots, and five of six at eight shots. Error decomposition locates the gain in a shift in grading severity, not sharper discrimination, and the shift runs in opposite directions in the two families. A 124-million-parameter Indonesian encoder, included as a deployment reference, reaches 0.825 QWK in the social science domain at 596 MB, within 0.027 of the best 9-billion-parameter configurations. Language adaptation is therefore a conditional recalibration. Its value depends on the base model, on labeled answers already held, and on which score levels they display.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing Theories and Applications
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62411/jcta.17829
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conditional Returns to Language Adaptation: An Adaptation Ladder Study of Indonesian Short Answer Grading

Handaru Jati, Nurkhamid Nurkhamid, Imam Rangga Bakti
2 links
Journal of Computing Theories and Applications
Educational Technology and Assessment
article

Conditional Returns to Language Adaptation: An Adaptation Ladder Study of Indonesian Short Answer Grading

Handaru Jati, Nurkhamid Nurkhamid, Imam Rangga Bakti
article en

Abstract

Indonesian has several adapted language models for automatic short answer grading. Studies disagree about whether specialization is worthwhile; each test one point on the adaptation spectrum, so a losing language-specific model is indistinguishable from useless specialization. An ordinal comparison replaces it: a three-rung ladder of released checkpoints, from no Indonesian adaptation through regional to national continued pretraining, in two families whose rungs share a base model and parameter count. In the Gemma family, the first two rungs are siblings rather than ancestor and descendant, which the analysis carries through. Across 30,960 grading calls on 36 independent questions, with the question as the unit of inference, returns are conditional rather than cumulative. Regional adaptation helps both families, by 0.029 and 0.018 pooled quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). The second step adds little on the weaker base, 0.016, and harms the stronger one, −0.029. That decline is established in one family and directional in the other. Labelled examples drawn from the question being graded halve the remaining advantage, and examples from other questions attenuate it further, from +0.069 to +0.005, a difference of −0.064 [−0.107, −0.022], although they grade less accurately in absolute terms. Spreading the demonstrated score levels reduces it to +0.029. All six models moved in the direction predicted from their initial scoring bias at four shots, and five of six at eight shots. Error decomposition locates the gain in a shift in grading severity, not sharper discrimination, and the shift runs in opposite directions in the two families. A 124-million-parameter Indonesian encoder, included as a deployment reference, reaches 0.825 QWK in the social science domain at 596 MB, within 0.027 of the best 9-billion-parameter configurations. Language adaptation is therefore a conditional recalibration. Its value depends on the base model, on labeled answers already held, and on which score levels they display.

Journal of Computing Theories and ApplicationsVol. 4(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Educational Technology and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon