The Influence of Superstitious Beliefs On Decision Making Among Housewives and Working Women: A Comparative Study

Superstitious beliefs remain prevalent across cultures despite being fundamentally incompatible with scientific reasoning, yet their relationship with decision-making styles remains underexplored in South Asian contexts. This study examined the influence of superstitious beliefs on decision-making styles among housewives and working women in Pakistan. A sample of 250 women (125 housewives, 125 working women) completed the Superstitious Beliefs Scale (SBS) and the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) inventory. Pearson correlations, hierarchical regression, and MANOVA were employed to analyze the data. Results revealed that superstitious beliefs were significantly positively correlated with avoidant (r = .34, p < .01), dependent (r = .28, p < .01), and intuitive (r = .19, p < .01) decision-making styles, while showing a significant negative correlation with rational style (r = -.25, p < .01). Hierarchical regression confirmed that superstitious beliefs significantly predicted avoidant decision-making (β = .32, p < .001) even after controlling for age and education. MANOVA found that there were significant differences between groups (Wilks Λ =.824, p =.001), with the housewives scoring higher on superstitious beliefs, social superstitious behavior, belief in bad luck, dependent style, and avoidant style, and working women scored higher on the rational style. The results discuss the significance of occupational roles in influencing cognitive processes and the importance of culturally sensitive interventions to support rational decision-making in Pakistani women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Insight Journal
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.68024/h07ag720
Primary Topic
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Superstitious Beliefs On Decision Making Among Housewives and Working Women: A Comparative Study

Anam Zafar, Alina, Amal Asghar
1 links
Scholar Insight Journal
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
article

The Influence of Superstitious Beliefs On Decision Making Among Housewives and Working Women: A Comparative Study

Anam Zafar, Alina, Amal Asghar
article en

Abstract

Superstitious beliefs remain prevalent across cultures despite being fundamentally incompatible with scientific reasoning, yet their relationship with decision-making styles remains underexplored in South Asian contexts. This study examined the influence of superstitious beliefs on decision-making styles among housewives and working women in Pakistan. A sample of 250 women (125 housewives, 125 working women) completed the Superstitious Beliefs Scale (SBS) and the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) inventory. Pearson correlations, hierarchical regression, and MANOVA were employed to analyze the data. Results revealed that superstitious beliefs were significantly positively correlated with avoidant (r = .34, p < .01), dependent (r = .28, p < .01), and intuitive (r = .19, p < .01) decision-making styles, while showing a significant negative correlation with rational style (r = -.25, p < .01). Hierarchical regression confirmed that superstitious beliefs significantly predicted avoidant decision-making (β = .32, p < .001) even after controlling for age and education. MANOVA found that there were significant differences between groups (Wilks Λ =.824, p =.001), with the housewives scoring higher on superstitious beliefs, social superstitious behavior, belief in bad luck, dependent style, and avoidant style, and working women scored higher on the rational style. The results discuss the significance of occupational roles in influencing cognitive processes and the importance of culturally sensitive interventions to support rational decision-making in Pakistani women.

Scholar Insight JournalVol. 4(4)
University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon