Artificial Intelligence and Religious Policy: Ethical Governance in the Digital Public Sphere

Artificial intelligence increasingly mediates religious communication, knowledge, and participation in the digital public sphere, yet research remains fragmented across digital religion, human rights, and AI governance. This study examines how AI-mediated religious communication shapes authority, visibility, and participation; identifies associated ethical and rights-based concerns; and analyzes the institutional conditions relevant to its governance. Using a qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory-analytical design, the study draws on academic publications, policy documents, regulatory instruments, institutional guidelines, human-rights reports, and documented analyses of digital religious practices. Materials were purposively selected for substantive relevance and examined through structured reading and extraction, open and focused coding, thematic synthesis, source triangulation, and iterative cross-source comparison. The analysis identified three interconnected domains: access, visibility, and religious authority; religious freedom, inclusion, and algorithmic risks; and accountability, contestability, and institutional responsibility. AI-mediated technologies can broaden access to religious resources while simultaneously shaping the visibility and perceived authority of religious actors and interpretations. Expanded access can coexist with unequal representation, privacy risks, profiling, and constraints on meaningful participation, while distributed responsibility can create accountability gaps when consequential outcomes are difficult to explain or challenge. These relationships are context-dependent rather than predetermined effects of AI. By integrating sociotechnical and algorithmic-governance perspectives, the study provides an analytical framework for understanding ethical governance as the intersection of technological mediation, religious pluralism, fundamental rights, participation, and identifiable institutional responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i2.122
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Religious Policy: Ethical Governance in the Digital Public Sphere

Wildanul Hakim, Thariq Thieqiaq Thang, Noerhayati Huda
5 links
AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
article

Artificial Intelligence and Religious Policy: Ethical Governance in the Digital Public Sphere

Wildanul Hakim, Thariq Thieqiaq Thang, Noerhayati Huda
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence increasingly mediates religious communication, knowledge, and participation in the digital public sphere, yet research remains fragmented across digital religion, human rights, and AI governance. This study examines how AI-mediated religious communication shapes authority, visibility, and participation; identifies associated ethical and rights-based concerns; and analyzes the institutional conditions relevant to its governance. Using a qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory-analytical design, the study draws on academic publications, policy documents, regulatory instruments, institutional guidelines, human-rights reports, and documented analyses of digital religious practices. Materials were purposively selected for substantive relevance and examined through structured reading and extraction, open and focused coding, thematic synthesis, source triangulation, and iterative cross-source comparison. The analysis identified three interconnected domains: access, visibility, and religious authority; religious freedom, inclusion, and algorithmic risks; and accountability, contestability, and institutional responsibility. AI-mediated technologies can broaden access to religious resources while simultaneously shaping the visibility and perceived authority of religious actors and interpretations. Expanded access can coexist with unequal representation, privacy risks, profiling, and constraints on meaningful participation, while distributed responsibility can create accountability gaps when consequential outcomes are difficult to explain or challenge. These relationships are context-dependent rather than predetermined effects of AI. By integrating sociotechnical and algorithmic-governance perspectives, the study provides an analytical framework for understanding ethical governance as the intersection of technological mediation, religious pluralism, fundamental rights, participation, and identifiable institutional responsibility.

AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWSVol. 2(2)
Ministry of Religious Affairs (ID), Beihang University (CN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon