Corpus evidence and the limits of intuition in the study of collocation

Drawing on data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Russian National Corpus, the article examines how reliably native-speaker intuition describes collocation and semantic prosody. It is shown that speakers can usually judge whether a word combination is acceptable, but they are much less successful in assessing its frequency, its typical lexical environment, and the positive, negative or neutral evaluative colouring that a word acquires from its habitual contexts. Such features become visible only when large amounts of text are analysed. A contrastive analysis of English and Russian material demonstrates that these patterns are language-specific and cannot be transferred from one language to another through translation or introspection. On this basis, conclusions are drawn for Uzbek: the need to build and use corpora, to verify phraseological and lexicographic descriptions against corpus evidence, and to take collocational and prosodic information into account in teaching Uzbek and in translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Лингвоспектр
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23863016
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corpus evidence and the limits of intuition in the study of collocation

Radjabova Gulnoza Giyosiddinovna
1 links
Лингвоспектр
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

Corpus evidence and the limits of intuition in the study of collocation

Radjabova Gulnoza Giyosiddinovna
article en

Abstract

Drawing on data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Russian National Corpus, the article examines how reliably native-speaker intuition describes collocation and semantic prosody. It is shown that speakers can usually judge whether a word combination is acceptable, but they are much less successful in assessing its frequency, its typical lexical environment, and the positive, negative or neutral evaluative colouring that a word acquires from its habitual contexts. Such features become visible only when large amounts of text are analysed. A contrastive analysis of English and Russian material demonstrates that these patterns are language-specific and cannot be transferred from one language to another through translation or introspection. On this basis, conclusions are drawn for Uzbek: the need to build and use corpora, to verify phraseological and lexicographic descriptions against corpus evidence, and to take collocational and prosodic information into account in teaching Uzbek and in translation.

Лингвоспектр
Uzbek State University of World Languages (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon