Introduction to and Recent Developments in Bayesian Causal Inference: Propensity Scores, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, and Sensitivity Analysis

In recent years, Bayesian approaches to causal inference have advanced substantially and attracted increasing attention. This article provides an overview of Bayesian methods for causal inference, with a focus on estimating causal effects for point treatments. As an introduction to Bayesian causal inference, we first revisited causal identification based on the g-formula and clarified how Bayesian inference could be linked to observed data likelihood under standard identifying assumptions. We also organized the role of the propensity score in Bayesian causal inference. We then reviewed Bayesian modeling tools commonly used as flexible outcome models, including nonparametric Bayesian models such as Gaussian processes, Bayesian additive regression trees, and Dirichlet process mixture models, as well as generalized Bayesian inference, which enabled model-free Bayesian updating. Subsequently, we discussed three recent developments in Bayesian causal inference. First, we examined the propensity score and feedback problem, highlighting the challenges that arose when propensity scores were incorporated into Bayesian inference, and reviewed possible solutions. Second, we reviewed methods for estimating treatment effect heterogeneity, with particular emphasis on Bayesian causal forests. Third, we introduced two approaches to sensitivity analysis, which represented a key advantage of Bayesian inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Biometrics
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5691/jjb.47.183
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction to and Recent Developments in Bayesian Causal Inference: Propensity Scores, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, and Sensitivity Analysis

Tomohiro Ohigashi, Shunichiro Orihara
Japanese Journal of Biometrics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Introduction to and Recent Developments in Bayesian Causal Inference: Propensity Scores, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, and Sensitivity Analysis

Tomohiro Ohigashi, Shunichiro Orihara
article en

Abstract

In recent years, Bayesian approaches to causal inference have advanced substantially and attracted increasing attention. This article provides an overview of Bayesian methods for causal inference, with a focus on estimating causal effects for point treatments. As an introduction to Bayesian causal inference, we first revisited causal identification based on the g-formula and clarified how Bayesian inference could be linked to observed data likelihood under standard identifying assumptions. We also organized the role of the propensity score in Bayesian causal inference. We then reviewed Bayesian modeling tools commonly used as flexible outcome models, including nonparametric Bayesian models such as Gaussian processes, Bayesian additive regression trees, and Dirichlet process mixture models, as well as generalized Bayesian inference, which enabled model-free Bayesian updating. Subsequently, we discussed three recent developments in Bayesian causal inference. First, we examined the propensity score and feedback problem, highlighting the challenges that arose when propensity scores were incorporated into Bayesian inference, and reviewed possible solutions. Second, we reviewed methods for estimating treatment effect heterogeneity, with particular emphasis on Bayesian causal forests. Third, we introduced two approaches to sensitivity analysis, which represented a key advantage of Bayesian inference.

Japanese Journal of BiometricsVol. 47(2)
Tokyo Medical University (JP), Tokyo University of Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon