Institutionalizing Religious Moderation as Public Policy: Strategies for Addressing Social Polarization

Religious moderation has increasingly entered public-policy agendas in Indonesia, yet existing scholarship often examines its educational, community, institutional, and communicative dimensions separately, leaving their integration as an institutional policy process insufficiently explained. This study examines how religious moderation is institutionalized as public policy for addressing social polarization, the strategies and implementation conditions involved, and the monitoring and evaluation arrangements relevant to implementation and social outcomes. A qualitative documentary analysis was conducted using official Indonesian policy and strategic documents on religious moderation issued or enacted between 2020 and 2025, complemented by scholarly literature on documented implementation experiences and relevant social processes. The materials were examined through thematic analysis involving familiarization, analytical coding, cross-source comparison, and interpretive synthesis. The findings show that religious moderation has acquired a formal institutional architecture through policy direction, organizational mandates, implementation arrangements, coordination, and monitoring. Substantive implementation, however, depends on institutional capacity, multi-level coordination, meaningful participation, local adaptation, educational practice, rights safeguards, and public communication. The analysis further distinguishes implementation indicators from social-outcome indicators, showing that administrative activities and formal institutionalization do not by themselves demonstrate reduced polarization. The study therefore conceptualizes religious moderation as a layered institutional process in which its relevance to social polarization operates through institutional and intergroup processes. This framework provides a more precise basis for implementing and evaluating religious-moderation policy without equating policy adoption with demonstrated social effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i2.124
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutionalizing Religious Moderation as Public Policy: Strategies for Addressing Social Polarization

Mukhtar Alshodiq, Ni'mah Fathin, Marcus Noeh Fiedl
2 links
AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Institutionalizing Religious Moderation as Public Policy: Strategies for Addressing Social Polarization

Mukhtar Alshodiq, Ni'mah Fathin, Marcus Noeh Fiedl
article en

Abstract

Religious moderation has increasingly entered public-policy agendas in Indonesia, yet existing scholarship often examines its educational, community, institutional, and communicative dimensions separately, leaving their integration as an institutional policy process insufficiently explained. This study examines how religious moderation is institutionalized as public policy for addressing social polarization, the strategies and implementation conditions involved, and the monitoring and evaluation arrangements relevant to implementation and social outcomes. A qualitative documentary analysis was conducted using official Indonesian policy and strategic documents on religious moderation issued or enacted between 2020 and 2025, complemented by scholarly literature on documented implementation experiences and relevant social processes. The materials were examined through thematic analysis involving familiarization, analytical coding, cross-source comparison, and interpretive synthesis. The findings show that religious moderation has acquired a formal institutional architecture through policy direction, organizational mandates, implementation arrangements, coordination, and monitoring. Substantive implementation, however, depends on institutional capacity, multi-level coordination, meaningful participation, local adaptation, educational practice, rights safeguards, and public communication. The analysis further distinguishes implementation indicators from social-outcome indicators, showing that administrative activities and formal institutionalization do not by themselves demonstrate reduced polarization. The study therefore conceptualizes religious moderation as a layered institutional process in which its relevance to social polarization operates through institutional and intergroup processes. This framework provides a more precise basis for implementing and evaluating religious-moderation policy without equating policy adoption with demonstrated social effectiveness.

AMUYA INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWSVol. 2(2)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon