Reliability and Factor Structure of the Bangla Perceived Stress Scale among Infertile Women in Bangladesh

Background: Infertility is frequently accompanied by substantial psychological distress, making accurate assessment of perceived stress an important component of care for affected women. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring subjective stress appraisal, however, its factor structure and reliability have shown considerable variability across populations, particularly regarding its four reverse-coded items. This study aimed to evaluate the internal consistency and factor structure of the Bangla PSS-10 among infertile women in Bangladesh. Materials and methods: This study presents analysis using a dataset collected as part of a cross-sectional study conducted among 151 married, reproductive-aged women with infertility recruited from two hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis examined the underlying factor structure, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the diagonally Weighted Least Squares (WLSMV) estimator, tested the theoretically derived two-factor model of perceived helplessness and perceived self-efficacy. Results: The full 10-item scale showed inadequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.548). EFA supported a two factor structure, with the six helplessness items loading cleanly (0.450–0.780) but the four reverse-coded self efficacy items loading moreweakly (0.419–0.717). CFA confirmed suboptimal global model fit (χ²(34) = 105.93, CFI = 0.874, TLI = 0.833, RMSEA = 0.119, SRMR = 0.103). Standardized loadings for the perceived helplessness subscale were acceptable (0.387–0.793, α= 0.719, = 0.739), whereas the perceived self-efficacy subscale showed weak loadings (0.252–0.564) and poor reliability (α= 0.394, ω= 0.423), with the two latent factors showing no significant correlation (ϕ= 0.054, p = 0.604). Conclusion: The Bangla PSS-10 performed adequately for its helplessness items but poorly for its reverse-coded self efficacy items among infertile women, a pattern consistent with reverse-wording method effects reported in other cultural adaptations of the scale. A refined six-item helplessness-focused structure may offer a more psychometrically sound alternative for this population, though further validation using bifactor modelling, larger samples, and external validity measures is recommended before clinical or research application. IAHS Medical Journal Vol 9(1), June 2026;102-106

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IAHS Medical Journal
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/iahsmj.v9i1.94616
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Factor Structure of the Bangla Perceived Stress Scale among Infertile Women in Bangladesh

Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Iffat Tania Prianka
1 links
IAHS Medical Journal
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Reliability and Factor Structure of the Bangla Perceived Stress Scale among Infertile Women in Bangladesh

Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Iffat Tania Prianka
article en

Abstract

Background: Infertility is frequently accompanied by substantial psychological distress, making accurate assessment of perceived stress an important component of care for affected women. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring subjective stress appraisal, however, its factor structure and reliability have shown considerable variability across populations, particularly regarding its four reverse-coded items. This study aimed to evaluate the internal consistency and factor structure of the Bangla PSS-10 among infertile women in Bangladesh. Materials and methods: This study presents analysis using a dataset collected as part of a cross-sectional study conducted among 151 married, reproductive-aged women with infertility recruited from two hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis examined the underlying factor structure, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the diagonally Weighted Least Squares (WLSMV) estimator, tested the theoretically derived two-factor model of perceived helplessness and perceived self-efficacy. Results: The full 10-item scale showed inadequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.548). EFA supported a two factor structure, with the six helplessness items loading cleanly (0.450–0.780) but the four reverse-coded self efficacy items loading moreweakly (0.419–0.717). CFA confirmed suboptimal global model fit (χ²(34) = 105.93, CFI = 0.874, TLI = 0.833, RMSEA = 0.119, SRMR = 0.103). Standardized loadings for the perceived helplessness subscale were acceptable (0.387–0.793, α= 0.719, = 0.739), whereas the perceived self-efficacy subscale showed weak loadings (0.252–0.564) and poor reliability (α= 0.394, ω= 0.423), with the two latent factors showing no significant correlation (ϕ= 0.054, p = 0.604). Conclusion: The Bangla PSS-10 performed adequately for its helplessness items but poorly for its reverse-coded self efficacy items among infertile women, a pattern consistent with reverse-wording method effects reported in other cultural adaptations of the scale. A refined six-item helplessness-focused structure may offer a more psychometrically sound alternative for this population, though further validation using bifactor modelling, larger samples, and external validity measures is recommended before clinical or research application. IAHS Medical Journal Vol 9(1), June 2026;102-106

IAHS Medical JournalVol. 9(1)
Directorate General of Health Services (BD), Ibrahim Medical College (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon