The Axiomatic Theory of Global Protocol Federalism and Constitutional Order in AI-Native Societies
ANOA — Essay VI The Axiomatic Theory of Global Protocol Federalism and Constitutional Order in AI-Native Societies Representation Economy, Inferential Web, Distributed Applications, Founding Architectural Human Agency and the Political Economy of Protocol Design Abstract This paper develops an axiomatic and constitutional framework for global protocol federalism in AI-native societies, integrating the Representation Economy, the Inferential Web, distributed applications (dApps), autonomous economic agents, and the political economy of protocol architecture. The study examines how shared constitutional principles and interoperable technical standards may support coordination among autonomous federations, institutions, human participants, and artificial agents without requiring the establishment of a territorial sovereign authority or dependence on a single monetary infrastructure. Particular attention is given to the Founding Architect as a scientific, institutional, and economic actor responsible for defining and maintaining common architectural standards within bounded constitutional authority. The framework distinguishes legitimate remuneration, intellectual-property rights, stakeholder financing, and organizational development from political sovereignty and unrestricted constitutional power. The proposed architecture separates economic representation, computational inference, delegated authorization, distributed execution, and monetary settlement. It accommodates heterogeneous financial infrastructures, including conventional banking systems, tokenized instruments, and decentralized networks, while preserving human agency, institutional accountability, and federated autonomy. Through proposed axioms, constitutional provisions, formal propositions, and conceptual stress-testing criteria, the paper establishes a research framework for investigating the institutional stability, interoperability, and economic sustainability of AI-native protocol federations. The results are theoretical and conditional. They do not constitute empirical validation, enacted constitutional law, regulatory authorization, or evidence of institutional adoption. Keywords: ANOA; AI-Native Organizational Architecture; Protocol Federalism; Representation Economy; Inferential Web; Agentic Economy; Protocol Architecture; Distributed Applications; Human Agency; Constitutional Governance; Machine-Native Economy; Monetary Interoperability.
Authors
- Marco Patrone
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23861774
- Primary Topic
- Political Systems and Governance
- Type
- preprint