User privacy VS technological innovation? Navigating AR smart glasses adoption

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled augmented reality (AR) smart glasses represent an emerging form of wearable technology that combines immersive interaction, hands-free functionality, and continuous access to digital information. However, their adoption may involve a trade-off between perceived benefits and privacy-related risks.Objectives: This study investigates how hedonic, utilitarian, and symbolic benefits influence trust in AI-AR smart glasses and examines whether personal privacy concerns, perceived surveillance, and ethical fear negatively affect trust.It further examines the role of trust in explaining adoption behaviour.Methods/Approach: Drawing on Privacy Calculus Theory, the study employed a quantitative research design.Data were collected from 850 respondents following a standardised five-minute demonstration of selected AI-AR smart-glasses features, resulting in 810 valid responses.Participants had prior experience with AR-enabled applications but had not previously used AR smart glasses.The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples, supplemented by predictive assessment using CVPAT and PLSpredict.Results: The findings show that hedonic, utilitarian, and symbolic benefits positively influence trust, whereas personal privacy concerns, perceived surveillance, and ethical fear negatively influence trust.Trust, in turn, positively influences adoption behaviour.The findings also indicate that the proposed model provides meaningful explanatory and predictive value for understanding adoption behaviour.Conclusions: The study demonstrates that trust serves as the central mechanism connecting perceived benefits and privacy risks with adoption behaviour.It extends Privacy Calculus Theory to AI-AR wearable technology by incorporating symbolic benefits alongside device-specific privacy risks and provides implications for technology developers and marketers seeking to strengthen adoption while addressing privacy concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economy
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2027.8.1(7)
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User privacy VS technological innovation? Navigating AR smart glasses adoption

Gyaneshwar Singh Kushwaha, Binod Doley, Parv Gupta, Rashmi Kushwaha et al.
ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economy
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

User privacy VS technological innovation? Navigating AR smart glasses adoption

Gyaneshwar Singh Kushwaha, Binod Doley, Parv Gupta, Rashmi Kushwaha, Shivam Sahu
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled augmented reality (AR) smart glasses represent an emerging form of wearable technology that combines immersive interaction, hands-free functionality, and continuous access to digital information. However, their adoption may involve a trade-off between perceived benefits and privacy-related risks.Objectives: This study investigates how hedonic, utilitarian, and symbolic benefits influence trust in AI-AR smart glasses and examines whether personal privacy concerns, perceived surveillance, and ethical fear negatively affect trust.It further examines the role of trust in explaining adoption behaviour.Methods/Approach: Drawing on Privacy Calculus Theory, the study employed a quantitative research design.Data were collected from 850 respondents following a standardised five-minute demonstration of selected AI-AR smart-glasses features, resulting in 810 valid responses.Participants had prior experience with AR-enabled applications but had not previously used AR smart glasses.The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples, supplemented by predictive assessment using CVPAT and PLSpredict.Results: The findings show that hedonic, utilitarian, and symbolic benefits positively influence trust, whereas personal privacy concerns, perceived surveillance, and ethical fear negatively influence trust.Trust, in turn, positively influences adoption behaviour.The findings also indicate that the proposed model provides meaningful explanatory and predictive value for understanding adoption behaviour.Conclusions: The study demonstrates that trust serves as the central mechanism connecting perceived benefits and privacy risks with adoption behaviour.It extends Privacy Calculus Theory to AI-AR wearable technology by incorporating symbolic benefits alongside device-specific privacy risks and provides implications for technology developers and marketers seeking to strengthen adoption while addressing privacy concerns.

ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economyVol. 8(1)
Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon