A 13-Variable Hour-24 Model for 7-Day ICU Mortality in Neurocritical Care: Strong Cross-Database Discrimination with Unit-Level Calibration Differences

Abstract Background Short-horizon neurocritical risk estimates must remain accurate across care settings. We developed a 13-variable model at hour 24 for intensive care unit (ICU) mortality by day 7 and evaluated its transport to a second database. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, adults alive in the ICU at hour 24 were identified in the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) version 2.0 for development and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) version 3.1 for cross-database evaluation. Earlier analyses, including MIMIC-IV target data, informed the cohort definitions; the final fitted model was applied unchanged. We harmonized 13 predictors and compared six model families with hospital- and patient-grouped repeated nested validation. Log loss and a one-standard-error rule governed model selection. Results eICU-CRD contributed 20,810 admissions, 885 deaths, and 192 hospitals; MIMIC-IV contributed 6,821 admissions and 203 deaths. The selection rule chose cubic B-spline ridge logistic regression. The nested selection procedure yielded an internal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.8765 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8626 to 0.8872), with a Brier score of 0.03407 and calibration slope of 0.9861. In MIMIC-IV, AUROC was 0.9037 (95% CI, 0.8873 to 0.9204), Brier score 0.02456, and calibration slope 0.9750. The pooled observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio was 0.984; By initial care setting, O/E indicated underprediction in the neurologic surgical ICU (Neuro SICU; 1.588) and overprediction in intermediate/stepdown care (0.371). Conclusions A transparent 13-variable hour-24 model retained strong discrimination after frozen cross-database transport. Care-setting calibration exposed offsetting probability errors hidden by pooled estimates, supporting unit-specific prospective evaluation of neurocritical early-warning workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11330992/v1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A 13-Variable Hour-24 Model for 7-Day ICU Mortality in Neurocritical Care: Strong Cross-Database Discrimination with Unit-Level Calibration Differences

Jiang Wen, Xing Cao, Quan Liu, Aili Jia et al.
2 links
Research Square
Machine Learning in Healthcare
preprint

A 13-Variable Hour-24 Model for 7-Day ICU Mortality in Neurocritical Care: Strong Cross-Database Discrimination with Unit-Level Calibration Differences

Jiang Wen, Xing Cao, Quan Liu, Aili Jia, Zhang Xiaodong, Xue Chen, Junhao Chu, Shuaijia Zeng, Xing Chen
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Short-horizon neurocritical risk estimates must remain accurate across care settings. We developed a 13-variable model at hour 24 for intensive care unit (ICU) mortality by day 7 and evaluated its transport to a second database. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, adults alive in the ICU at hour 24 were identified in the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) version 2.0 for development and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) version 3.1 for cross-database evaluation. Earlier analyses, including MIMIC-IV target data, informed the cohort definitions; the final fitted model was applied unchanged. We harmonized 13 predictors and compared six model families with hospital- and patient-grouped repeated nested validation. Log loss and a one-standard-error rule governed model selection. Results eICU-CRD contributed 20,810 admissions, 885 deaths, and 192 hospitals; MIMIC-IV contributed 6,821 admissions and 203 deaths. The selection rule chose cubic B-spline ridge logistic regression. The nested selection procedure yielded an internal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.8765 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8626 to 0.8872), with a Brier score of 0.03407 and calibration slope of 0.9861. In MIMIC-IV, AUROC was 0.9037 (95% CI, 0.8873 to 0.9204), Brier score 0.02456, and calibration slope 0.9750. The pooled observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio was 0.984; By initial care setting, O/E indicated underprediction in the neurologic surgical ICU (Neuro SICU; 1.588) and overprediction in intermediate/stepdown care (0.371). Conclusions A transparent 13-variable hour-24 model retained strong discrimination after frozen cross-database transport. Care-setting calibration exposed offsetting probability errors hidden by pooled estimates, supporting unit-specific prospective evaluation of neurocritical early-warning workflows.

Research Square
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN), Chengdu University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon