How Many Real Photos Does It Take? Finite-Sample False-Alarm Control of Frozen AI-Image Detectors under Paired Camera-Processing Shift — Preregistration (v1.0)

Preregistration (v1.0, 2026-11-01) of a confirmatory study on finite-sample false-alarm control of six frozen AI-generated-image detectors when the processing chain of real photographs changes (denoising, learned restoration, JPEG, resizing, alternative demosaicing). Hypotheses: H1, a Neyman–Pearson threshold calibrated on a reference chain fails to keep the false-positive rate on other chains; H2, the number of real photographs needed to recalibrate (n ≥ 59 for α = δ = 0.05) and its cost in detection rate; H3, blind image-computed groups versus a single worst-group threshold. New data: 300 RAW photographs from MIT-Adobe FiveK and 306 images from 9 commercial generators (Community Forensics evaluation set). Deposited before any detector score is computed on the new data. Files: the preregistration and the frozen analysis script c2_analyse.py (SHA-256 f207ce83c2e616c3ccf62aa50c11f755d82ce2d6629f5be2bf869942efc24284), tested on simulated data only. No images and no model weights. No funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23863745
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Many Real Photos Does It Take? Finite-Sample False-Alarm Control of Frozen AI-Image Detectors under Paired Camera-Processing Shift — Preregistration (v1.0)

Mohammed Mahdaoui
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

How Many Real Photos Does It Take? Finite-Sample False-Alarm Control of Frozen AI-Image Detectors under Paired Camera-Processing Shift — Preregistration (v1.0)

Mohammed Mahdaoui
article en

Abstract

Preregistration (v1.0, 2026-11-01) of a confirmatory study on finite-sample false-alarm control of six frozen AI-generated-image detectors when the processing chain of real photographs changes (denoising, learned restoration, JPEG, resizing, alternative demosaicing). Hypotheses: H1, a Neyman–Pearson threshold calibrated on a reference chain fails to keep the false-positive rate on other chains; H2, the number of real photographs needed to recalibrate (n ≥ 59 for α = δ = 0.05) and its cost in detection rate; H3, blind image-computed groups versus a single worst-group threshold. New data: 300 RAW photographs from MIT-Adobe FiveK and 306 images from 9 commercial generators (Community Forensics evaluation set). Deposited before any detector score is computed on the new data. Files: the preregistration and the frozen analysis script c2_analyse.py (SHA-256 f207ce83c2e616c3ccf62aa50c11f755d82ce2d6629f5be2bf869942efc24284), tested on simulated data only. No images and no model weights. No funding.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon