The Digital Divide in Global Communication: Inequality, Governance, and the Contest for Narrative Power

The spread of information and communication technologies has made connectivity central to global communication, yet the benefits of this transformation are distributed unequally. This article examines the digital divide as a structural feature of contemporary global media rather than a mere gap in hardware access. Drawing on scholarship that treats the divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon, it argues that the divide operates on at least three intersecting levels: access, usage and skill, and algorithmic and infrastructural power. It then traces how the divide is deepened by the politics of platform governance and by asymmetric control over digital content, and considers how these asymmetries become acute in armed conflict, where the ability to generate, moderate, and frame information is itself a weapon. The article concludes that bridging the divide requires not only connectivity and digital literacy but a redistribution of the power to produce and govern the global media environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial economics research.
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70267/fer.v3n6.0108
Primary Topic
Information Society and Technology Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Digital Divide in Global Communication: Inequality, Governance, and the Contest for Narrative Power

操学诚
1 links
Financial economics research.
Information Society and Technology Trends
article

The Digital Divide in Global Communication: Inequality, Governance, and the Contest for Narrative Power

操学诚
article en

Abstract

The spread of information and communication technologies has made connectivity central to global communication, yet the benefits of this transformation are distributed unequally. This article examines the digital divide as a structural feature of contemporary global media rather than a mere gap in hardware access. Drawing on scholarship that treats the divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon, it argues that the divide operates on at least three intersecting levels: access, usage and skill, and algorithmic and infrastructural power. It then traces how the divide is deepened by the politics of platform governance and by asymmetric control over digital content, and considers how these asymmetries become acute in armed conflict, where the ability to generate, moderate, and frame information is itself a weapon. The article concludes that bridging the divide requires not only connectivity and digital literacy but a redistribution of the power to produce and govern the global media environment.

Financial economics research.Vol. 3(6)
Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Information Society and Technology Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon