Decision regret following rapid genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis

INTRODUCTION: Genetic testing is increasingly being offered at the time of breast cancer diagnosis to help women guide their treatment decisions. The objective of the current study was to measure decision regret 1 year after genetic testing and to evaluate the factors associated with regret. METHODS: Women from across Canada were referred to receive rapid genetic testing for breast cancer predisposition genes at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53, ATM, and CHEK2). Questionnaires were completed prior to testing and 1-week and 1-year postgenetic testing. Decision regret was measured at one-year. RESULTS: Overall, 871 women participated and the mean age at diagnosis was 46.0 years (range 19-70 years), and 522 (59.9%) of the women were White. Pathogenic variants were found in 83 women (9.5%). The mean score for decision regret was 7.86 (SD 14.17), with 802 women (92.1%) having no regret and 69 participants (7.9%) having regret. Women from racialized groups were more likely to regret their decision compared to White women (13.4% vs 4.4%; p < .001). Those with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant were significantly more likely to have regret compared to those with a negative result (p = .03). CONCLUSION: A minority of women who have rapid genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis later regret their decision. Women at greater risk of having decision regret included those who received a positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic test, and those from racialized groups. Follow-up counseling may be warranted for those who experience decision regret.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70663
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision regret following rapid genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis

Kelly A. Metcalfe, David Wai Lim, Tuya Pal, Frances Catriona Wright et al.
Cancer
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Decision regret following rapid genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis

Kelly A. Metcalfe, David Wai Lim, Tuya Pal, Frances Catriona Wright, Alana Hosein, Renee Hanrahan, Andrea F. Eisen, Steven Alexander Narod, Aletta Poll, Ling‐Fang Hsu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Genetic testing is increasingly being offered at the time of breast cancer diagnosis to help women guide their treatment decisions. The objective of the current study was to measure decision regret 1 year after genetic testing and to evaluate the factors associated with regret. METHODS: Women from across Canada were referred to receive rapid genetic testing for breast cancer predisposition genes at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53, ATM, and CHEK2). Questionnaires were completed prior to testing and 1-week and 1-year postgenetic testing. Decision regret was measured at one-year. RESULTS: Overall, 871 women participated and the mean age at diagnosis was 46.0 years (range 19-70 years), and 522 (59.9%) of the women were White. Pathogenic variants were found in 83 women (9.5%). The mean score for decision regret was 7.86 (SD 14.17), with 802 women (92.1%) having no regret and 69 participants (7.9%) having regret. Women from racialized groups were more likely to regret their decision compared to White women (13.4% vs 4.4%; p < .001). Those with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant were significantly more likely to have regret compared to those with a negative result (p = .03). CONCLUSION: A minority of women who have rapid genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis later regret their decision. Women at greater risk of having decision regret included those who received a positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic test, and those from racialized groups. Follow-up counseling may be warranted for those who experience decision regret.

CancerVol. 132(21)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (CA), Trillium Health Centre (CA), Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US), Women’s College Hospital Research and Innovation Institute (CA), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Women's College Hospital, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon