Stock market reaction to Hindenburg research report and judicial intervention in Adani Group

Background: This study investigates the stock market reaction of nine listed Adani Group companies to two sequential information events, the publication of the Hindenburg Research report and the subsequent Supreme Court judgment, to examine how investors revised their expectations following adverse corporate allegations and judicial developments.Methods/Approach: The study employs the event study methodology using a 21-day event window to analyse abnormal stock returns surrounding the publication of the Hindenburg Research report on 24 January 2023 and the Supreme Court judgment on 3 January 2024.Three market models were used to estimate abnormal returns and evaluate the statistical significance of the market reaction.Results: The findings indicate that the Hindenburg Research report generated negative stock price movements across all nine listed Adani Group companies.However, statistically significant abnormal returns were observed only for Adani Green Energy Ltd., Adani Enterprises Ltd., Adani Wilmar Ltd., Adani Power Ltd., and Adani Total Gas Ltd.Among the companies, Adani Total Gas Ltd. experienced the largest cumulative decline, with its share price falling by approximately 83% by 28 February 2023.Following the Supreme Court judgment, a statistically significant positive abnormal return was observed only for Adani Power Ltd. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that activist short-seller reports can substantially influence investor behaviour and stock prices, while subsequent judicial developments may only partially mitigate the adverse market reaction.The study provides practical implications for investors, corporate managers, regulators, and policymakers regarding information credibility, corporate governance, and market efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economy
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2027.8.1(3)
Primary Topic
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stock market reaction to Hindenburg research report and judicial intervention in Adani Group

Tanupriya Singh, Shivam Azad, Nilesh Kumar Tiwari, Mridula RAJAK
2 links
ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economy
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
article

Stock market reaction to Hindenburg research report and judicial intervention in Adani Group

Tanupriya Singh, Shivam Azad, Nilesh Kumar Tiwari, Mridula RAJAK
article en

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the stock market reaction of nine listed Adani Group companies to two sequential information events, the publication of the Hindenburg Research report and the subsequent Supreme Court judgment, to examine how investors revised their expectations following adverse corporate allegations and judicial developments.Methods/Approach: The study employs the event study methodology using a 21-day event window to analyse abnormal stock returns surrounding the publication of the Hindenburg Research report on 24 January 2023 and the Supreme Court judgment on 3 January 2024.Three market models were used to estimate abnormal returns and evaluate the statistical significance of the market reaction.Results: The findings indicate that the Hindenburg Research report generated negative stock price movements across all nine listed Adani Group companies.However, statistically significant abnormal returns were observed only for Adani Green Energy Ltd., Adani Enterprises Ltd., Adani Wilmar Ltd., Adani Power Ltd., and Adani Total Gas Ltd.Among the companies, Adani Total Gas Ltd. experienced the largest cumulative decline, with its share price falling by approximately 83% by 28 February 2023.Following the Supreme Court judgment, a statistically significant positive abnormal return was observed only for Adani Power Ltd. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that activist short-seller reports can substantially influence investor behaviour and stock prices, while subsequent judicial developments may only partially mitigate the adverse market reaction.The study provides practical implications for investors, corporate managers, regulators, and policymakers regarding information credibility, corporate governance, and market efficiency.

ACCESS Access to science business innovation in digital economyVol. 8(1)
Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Securities Regulation and Market Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon