Biosphere Constitutionalism: An Institutional Design Framework for Earth System Governance

Earth System Governance scholarship has documented the mismatch between planetary-scale ecological disruption and fragmented institutions of environmental decision-making. This article develops biosphere constitutionalism as an institutional design framework for addressing that mismatch. It argues that biospheric integrity should not be treated merely as an interest within constitutional balancing, but as the biophysical condition under which interests, balancing and constitutional reasoning remain possible. From this position, the article derives three institutional functions — standing, priority and representation — corresponding to integration, thresholding and absence of self-representation. The framework is differentiated from environmental constitutionalism, Earth governance through trusteeship and ecological democracy, and positioned within Earth System Law as one institutional element rather than a competing paradigm. Five design pathways operationalise the functions, including a worked application to European Union climate governance. The article specifies constitutional architecture without proposing world government. Preprint, not peer-reviewed. Manuscript completed in May 2026. Its argument was subsequently developed into the Declaration for an Earth Constitution, version 1.6.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23862234
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Biosphere Constitutionalism: An Institutional Design Framework for Earth System Governance

Donald Jacob
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental law and policy
preprint

Biosphere Constitutionalism: An Institutional Design Framework for Earth System Governance

Donald Jacob
preprint en

Abstract

Earth System Governance scholarship has documented the mismatch between planetary-scale ecological disruption and fragmented institutions of environmental decision-making. This article develops biosphere constitutionalism as an institutional design framework for addressing that mismatch. It argues that biospheric integrity should not be treated merely as an interest within constitutional balancing, but as the biophysical condition under which interests, balancing and constitutional reasoning remain possible. From this position, the article derives three institutional functions — standing, priority and representation — corresponding to integration, thresholding and absence of self-representation. The framework is differentiated from environmental constitutionalism, Earth governance through trusteeship and ecological democracy, and positioned within Earth System Law as one institutional element rather than a competing paradigm. Five design pathways operationalise the functions, including a worked application to European Union climate governance. The article specifies constitutional architecture without proposing world government. Preprint, not peer-reviewed. Manuscript completed in May 2026. Its argument was subsequently developed into the Declaration for an Earth Constitution, version 1.6.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Life on land
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon