Digital revision portfolios for developing English writing skills in Uzbek secondary schools

This article examines how digital revision portfolios can support the development of English writing skills in Uzbek general secondary schools. It addresses the pedagogical distinction between correcting a text and helping learners understand their own revision decisions. The study uses a focused narrative review of literature on second language writing, educational technology, collaborative writing, automated feedback, and formative assessment. On this basis, it proposes a classroom model combining an initial draft, selected feedback, a revised text, and a brief learner reflection. The model prioritises meaningful changes in content and organisation alongside grammatical accuracy. Particular attention is given to teacher guidance, accessible technology, individual authorship, and the evaluation of independent writing. The article offers practical criteria for analysing revision quality and outlines a possible design for subsequent classroom research. It concludes that digital portfolios should be evaluated through learners’ reasoning and transfer of learning rather than through the number of corrections or platform activities alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Лингвоспектр
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23863606
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital revision portfolios for developing English writing skills in Uzbek secondary schools

E'zoza Baxtiyor qizi Omonova, Aziza Batirovna Musoyeva
2 links
Лингвоспектр
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Digital revision portfolios for developing English writing skills in Uzbek secondary schools

E'zoza Baxtiyor qizi Omonova, Aziza Batirovna Musoyeva
article en

Abstract

This article examines how digital revision portfolios can support the development of English writing skills in Uzbek general secondary schools. It addresses the pedagogical distinction between correcting a text and helping learners understand their own revision decisions. The study uses a focused narrative review of literature on second language writing, educational technology, collaborative writing, automated feedback, and formative assessment. On this basis, it proposes a classroom model combining an initial draft, selected feedback, a revised text, and a brief learner reflection. The model prioritises meaningful changes in content and organisation alongside grammatical accuracy. Particular attention is given to teacher guidance, accessible technology, individual authorship, and the evaluation of independent writing. The article offers practical criteria for analysing revision quality and outlines a possible design for subsequent classroom research. It concludes that digital portfolios should be evaluated through learners’ reasoning and transfer of learning rather than through the number of corrections or platform activities alone.

Лингвоспектр
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages (UZ)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon