Beyond Produced Water: Extending Cactus Water to Lithium and Other Oilfield Waste

The Supreme Court of Texas addressed ownership of hydrocarbon waste in a typical oil and gas lease in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC.Despite its importance, the holding was narrowly tailored to the issue before the court.The Court held that "produced water" and constituent water molecules belong to the producer absent express language otherwise.The majority opinion did not address the "product stream" theory or how this holding applies to other waste substances and constituent products.However, the reasoning the Court used to imply ownership of produced water and constituent water molecules is just as applicable to other waste products and constituents.This article will therefore argue that Texas courts should follow the same ownership framework applied to produced water and clearly establish the rule that other waste products-and substances entrained within-are property of the producer.* The University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D. Candidate, Class of 2027.I would like to thank Professor Joseph A. Schremmer for his invaluable support and for sharing his incredible knowledge.I am

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)
Published
2026-10-30
Primary Topic
Energy Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Produced Water: Extending Cactus Water to Lithium and Other Oilfield Waste

Louis W. Krivanek IV
University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)
Energy Law and Policy
article

Beyond Produced Water: Extending Cactus Water to Lithium and Other Oilfield Waste

Louis W. Krivanek IV
article en

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Texas addressed ownership of hydrocarbon waste in a typical oil and gas lease in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC.Despite its importance, the holding was narrowly tailored to the issue before the court.The Court held that "produced water" and constituent water molecules belong to the producer absent express language otherwise.The majority opinion did not address the "product stream" theory or how this holding applies to other waste substances and constituent products.However, the reasoning the Court used to imply ownership of produced water and constituent water molecules is just as applicable to other waste products and constituents.This article will therefore argue that Texas courts should follow the same ownership framework applied to produced water and clearly establish the rule that other waste products-and substances entrained within-are property of the producer.* The University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D. Candidate, Class of 2027.I would like to thank Professor Joseph A. Schremmer for his invaluable support and for sharing his incredible knowledge.I am

University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Energy Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Beyond Produced Water: Extending Cactus Water to Lithium and Other Oilfield Waste — Louis W. Krivanek IV · University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS