Ultrafast brain MRI at 3 T for suspected acute ischemic stroke: interchangeability of the ultrafast and standard protocols

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the interchangeability of the super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR)-based ultrafast protocol with the standard protocol for acute ischemic stroke detection at 3 T. Materials and methods In this prospective study, 100 patients (mean age, 66.1 ± 16.2 years; 65 men) with suspected acute ischemic stroke underwent both the standard and ultrafast protocols (diffusion-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2*-weighted imaging). All images were reconstructed using SR-DLR; the ultrafast protocol employed accelerated acquisition with a reduced scan time. Two radiologists independently assessed both protocols for acute ischemic lesion detection, vascular territory involvement, and clinically relevant secondary findings. Interchangeability was evaluated using the individual equivalence index (IEI), with a prespecified ± 0.05 equivalence margin. Results Acute ischemic stroke was confirmed in 30 patients (30%). The ultrafast protocol reduced the mean total acquisition time by 61.7% (1 min 43 s vs. 4 min 29 s; P < 0.001). Interchangeability was demonstrated for patient-level acute ischemic lesion detection (IEI, 0.010 [90% confidence interval (CI): −0.006, 0.026]), vascular territory–level detection (IEIs, − 0.007 to 0.015), and clinically relevant secondary findings (IEI, 0.005 [90% CI: −0.025, 0.035]). Qualitative image quality scores were slightly but consistently higher for the ultrafast protocol across all four assessment items (all P ≤ 0.002). No significant differences were observed in ischemic lesion size or relative signal characteristics between protocols. Conclusion The ultrafast protocol was interchangeable with the standard protocol for detecting acute ischemic stroke, with reduced scan time and comparable or marginally improved image quality; however, this work-in-progress diffusion-weighted imaging algorithm warrants further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02103-5
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrafast brain MRI at 3 T for suspected acute ischemic stroke: interchangeability of the ultrafast and standard protocols

Satoshi Goshima, Shota Ishida, Yukichi Tanahashi, Kumi Ozaki et al.
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Ultrafast brain MRI at 3 T for suspected acute ischemic stroke: interchangeability of the ultrafast and standard protocols

Satoshi Goshima, Shota Ishida, Yukichi Tanahashi, Kumi Ozaki, Eri Sugioka, Shoya Haseyama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the interchangeability of the super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR)-based ultrafast protocol with the standard protocol for acute ischemic stroke detection at 3 T. Materials and methods In this prospective study, 100 patients (mean age, 66.1 ± 16.2 years; 65 men) with suspected acute ischemic stroke underwent both the standard and ultrafast protocols (diffusion-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2*-weighted imaging). All images were reconstructed using SR-DLR; the ultrafast protocol employed accelerated acquisition with a reduced scan time. Two radiologists independently assessed both protocols for acute ischemic lesion detection, vascular territory involvement, and clinically relevant secondary findings. Interchangeability was evaluated using the individual equivalence index (IEI), with a prespecified ± 0.05 equivalence margin. Results Acute ischemic stroke was confirmed in 30 patients (30%). The ultrafast protocol reduced the mean total acquisition time by 61.7% (1 min 43 s vs. 4 min 29 s; P < 0.001). Interchangeability was demonstrated for patient-level acute ischemic lesion detection (IEI, 0.010 [90% confidence interval (CI): −0.006, 0.026]), vascular territory–level detection (IEIs, − 0.007 to 0.015), and clinically relevant secondary findings (IEI, 0.005 [90% CI: −0.025, 0.035]). Qualitative image quality scores were slightly but consistently higher for the ultrafast protocol across all four assessment items (all P ≤ 0.002). No significant differences were observed in ischemic lesion size or relative signal characteristics between protocols. Conclusion The ultrafast protocol was interchangeable with the standard protocol for detecting acute ischemic stroke, with reduced scan time and comparable or marginally improved image quality; however, this work-in-progress diffusion-weighted imaging algorithm warrants further validation.

Japanese Journal of Radiology
Hamamatsu University (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Kyoto College of Medical Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon