Comparative dynamic response analysis of the Hybrid III head and neckform against a strength-scaled neuromuscular reference model in American football-relevant impacts

The Hybrid III anthropometric test device (ATD) is the most prominent head and neck surrogate device used for the laboratory testing of head protective equipment for American football, despite being originally designed and validated for an automotive frontal crash scenario. These differing impact conditions have been hypothesized to produce kinematic responses that lack biofidelity, leading to unrepresentative data and misinformed helmet design. This study characterizes the dynamic response of the Hybrid III neckform against a range of strength-scaled HYOID computational models. Blunt head impacts were performed experimentally on the Hybrid III ATD to produce kinematic responses in five directions: Sagittal Plane (SP) Flexion/Extension, Coronal Plane (CP) Right Lateral (RL) Bending, and 45° Off-Center (OC) Flexion/Extension. Impacts were then simulated in OpenSim on HYOID models with maximum isometric strength scaled from 1× to 11× baseline (0%–1000% increase). Results showed that HYOID models required strength increases of 400%–1000% to replicate the angular displacement magnitude observed in Hybrid III ATD impacts. Even under these extreme and non-physiological conditions, HYOID models were unable to reproduce Hybrid III ATD peak kinematic metrics outside of the sagittal plane, averaging an angular acceleration error of −36.48%, −23.93%, and −32.17% for CP RL Bending, 45° OC Flexion, and 45° OC Extension impacts, respectively. These findings highlight current limitations of available ATDs and support the development of sports-specific surrogate neck devices with improved biofidelity to be used in the laboratory evaluation of American football helmets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371261499540
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative dynamic response analysis of the Hybrid III head and neckform against a strength-scaled neuromuscular reference model in American football-relevant impacts

John D. DesJardins, Reed D. Gurchiek, Anthony P Marino, Madysn D Cardinal et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Comparative dynamic response analysis of the Hybrid III head and neckform against a strength-scaled neuromuscular reference model in American football-relevant impacts

John D. DesJardins, Reed D. Gurchiek, Anthony P Marino, Madysn D Cardinal, Grégory Batt, Benjamin McCall
article en

Abstract

The Hybrid III anthropometric test device (ATD) is the most prominent head and neck surrogate device used for the laboratory testing of head protective equipment for American football, despite being originally designed and validated for an automotive frontal crash scenario. These differing impact conditions have been hypothesized to produce kinematic responses that lack biofidelity, leading to unrepresentative data and misinformed helmet design. This study characterizes the dynamic response of the Hybrid III neckform against a range of strength-scaled HYOID computational models. Blunt head impacts were performed experimentally on the Hybrid III ATD to produce kinematic responses in five directions: Sagittal Plane (SP) Flexion/Extension, Coronal Plane (CP) Right Lateral (RL) Bending, and 45° Off-Center (OC) Flexion/Extension. Impacts were then simulated in OpenSim on HYOID models with maximum isometric strength scaled from 1× to 11× baseline (0%–1000% increase). Results showed that HYOID models required strength increases of 400%–1000% to replicate the angular displacement magnitude observed in Hybrid III ATD impacts. Even under these extreme and non-physiological conditions, HYOID models were unable to reproduce Hybrid III ATD peak kinematic metrics outside of the sagittal plane, averaging an angular acceleration error of −36.48%, −23.93%, and −32.17% for CP RL Bending, 45° OC Flexion, and 45° OC Extension impacts, respectively. These findings highlight current limitations of available ATDs and support the development of sports-specific surrogate neck devices with improved biofidelity to be used in the laboratory evaluation of American football helmets.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon