Social Work Licensure with a Criminal Record: A Legal Mapping Project of 56 U.S. States and Territories

This legal mapping paper aims to aggregate state-specific policies on the impact of criminal legal system contact—more specifically, the impact of criminal convictions—on social work licensure. Situating these policies within an abolitionist analysis and the larger history of social work in the United States, the paper attempts to expose the contradictions alive within the profession’s discourse. Social work discourses claim to value lived experience, yet social work licensure policies and practices often exclude the people and communities who, by lived experience, are uniquely qualified to do this work. Examining the language of these policies, this study poses questions concerning the ways that social work’s governing bodies gatekeep the profession through both implicit and explicit means. The research team found that in 2025, 35 state/territorial statutes required licensing boards to conduct criminal records background checks on social work licensure applicants. Fifty-three of the 56 jurisdictions (94.6%) specified that a criminal conviction—felony or misdemeanor—on an applicant’s record could lead to license denial. Across jurisdictions, convictions that could result in license denial ranged across misdemeanors and felonies. These findings are discussed within the context of rising criminalization in the United States, ongoing gatekeeping and licensure disparities within social work, and the recent proliferation of fair chance laws, which are intended to protect individuals with criminal records from discrimination on the basis of their criminal legal system contact. Using the data from this research as a starting point, this article offers an abolitionist critique of social work licensure and the restrictions accompanying it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52713/sgxwty30
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Work Licensure with a Criminal Record: A Legal Mapping Project of 56 U.S. States and Territories

Antara Anand, Natalie Casal Alcaíno, Brianna J. Suslovic, Jessica Brandon et al.
Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Social Work Licensure with a Criminal Record: A Legal Mapping Project of 56 U.S. States and Territories

Antara Anand, Natalie Casal Alcaíno, Brianna J. Suslovic, Jessica Brandon, Matthew W. Epperson, Teya Lovell, Halla Anderson, Nyla Conaway, Hannon Welch, Tanishq Rajan, Abbey Whigham, Zoë Phillips, Adrian Aira, Cea Murtha-Paradis, Louis Levy, Nino Claveria
article en

Abstract

This legal mapping paper aims to aggregate state-specific policies on the impact of criminal legal system contact—more specifically, the impact of criminal convictions—on social work licensure. Situating these policies within an abolitionist analysis and the larger history of social work in the United States, the paper attempts to expose the contradictions alive within the profession’s discourse. Social work discourses claim to value lived experience, yet social work licensure policies and practices often exclude the people and communities who, by lived experience, are uniquely qualified to do this work. Examining the language of these policies, this study poses questions concerning the ways that social work’s governing bodies gatekeep the profession through both implicit and explicit means. The research team found that in 2025, 35 state/territorial statutes required licensing boards to conduct criminal records background checks on social work licensure applicants. Fifty-three of the 56 jurisdictions (94.6%) specified that a criminal conviction—felony or misdemeanor—on an applicant’s record could lead to license denial. Across jurisdictions, convictions that could result in license denial ranged across misdemeanors and felonies. These findings are discussed within the context of rising criminalization in the United States, ongoing gatekeeping and licensure disparities within social work, and the recent proliferation of fair chance laws, which are intended to protect individuals with criminal records from discrimination on the basis of their criminal legal system contact. Using the data from this research as a starting point, this article offers an abolitionist critique of social work licensure and the restrictions accompanying it.

Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon