Vertical distribution of soil weed seed banks and comparison of seed bank estimation methods in a tropical agroecosystem

This study aimed to compare the wet sieve extraction (direct count) and seedling emergence methods for quantifying and characterising soil weed banks across three depth increments in a tropical agroecosystem. Soil seed banks are critical reservoirs of weed propagules, yet accurate and reliable assessment remains methodologically challenging. Both methods were evaluated across soil depths of 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm using a completely randomised design with 10 replicates at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. Wet sieving recovered far more seeds (310, 239 and 73 seeds per sample) than emergence (39, 19 and 12 seedlings per sample), with both methods showing significant depth declines (p < 0.001). Five weed taxa were recorded, namely Portulaca oleracea L., Amaranthus spp., Trianthema portulacastrum L., Echinochloa spp. and Dinebra spp. Wet sieving was appeared to be more effective in recovering the overall seed population, whereas the seedling emergence approach appeared more useful for identifying a wider range of species, particularly grasses. The combined use of both methods may therefore provide complementary information for preliminary assessment of soil weed seed banks under tropical conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Science Today
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.17119
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vertical distribution of soil weed seed banks and comparison of seed bank estimation methods in a tropical agroecosystem

M. Djanaguiraman, Jayakumar Renugadevi, P. M. Shanmugam, G Sasthri et al.
Plant Science Today
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
article

Vertical distribution of soil weed seed banks and comparison of seed bank estimation methods in a tropical agroecosystem

M. Djanaguiraman, Jayakumar Renugadevi, P. M. Shanmugam, G Sasthri, N M Rakshith
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the wet sieve extraction (direct count) and seedling emergence methods for quantifying and characterising soil weed banks across three depth increments in a tropical agroecosystem. Soil seed banks are critical reservoirs of weed propagules, yet accurate and reliable assessment remains methodologically challenging. Both methods were evaluated across soil depths of 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm using a completely randomised design with 10 replicates at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. Wet sieving recovered far more seeds (310, 239 and 73 seeds per sample) than emergence (39, 19 and 12 seedlings per sample), with both methods showing significant depth declines (p < 0.001). Five weed taxa were recorded, namely Portulaca oleracea L., Amaranthus spp., Trianthema portulacastrum L., Echinochloa spp. and Dinebra spp. Wet sieving was appeared to be more effective in recovering the overall seed population, whereas the seedling emergence approach appeared more useful for identifying a wider range of species, particularly grasses. The combined use of both methods may therefore provide complementary information for preliminary assessment of soil weed seed banks under tropical conditions.

Plant Science TodayVol. 13(sp9)
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon