Water footprint of large AI models: risks to global water security and sustainable optimization strategies

ABSTRACT Diagram linking AI model training and inference to lifecycle water use, estimated at 4.2–6.6 billion m³ annually by 2027, and showing water reuse, efficient cooling, smarter workloads, and standardized reporting as strategies to protect global water security. The rapid proliferation of large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) models has introduced a significant yet underexamined environmental challenge: freshwater consumption. This narrative review synthesizes scientific literature, industry sustainability reports, and case studies to quantify the water footprint of AI systems across their full lifecycle, from semiconductor fabrication and data center operations to electricity generation and supply chains. Direct water use occurs primarily through evaporative and liquid cooling in data centers, where a single large facility can consume 11,000–19,000m3/day. Indirect water use is embedded in electricity generation and chip manufacturing, with advanced fabrication plants drawing 10,000–37,000m3/day. Major technology companies, including Google, Microsoft, and Meta, collectively consume billions of cubic meters in 2022–2024, with consumption rising alongside accelerating AI deployment. Critically, over 52% of the world's top 100 data centers are projected to be located in high water stress regions by 2030, where AI infrastructure increasingly competes with agricultural, municipal, and ecological needs. Sustainable alternatives, including immersion cooling, nonpotable water reuse, and AI-driven workload optimization, offer measurable reductions but remain inconsistently adopted. The direct and indirect water footprints of AI models during their entire lifecycle are reviewed. Two of the main direct water usage sources are semiconductor manufacturing and data center cooling. Clip manufacturing and electricity generation significantly increase the indirect water footprint of AI. In areas with scarce freshwater supplies, the growth of AI technology may worsen water stress. Standardized reporting frameworks and lifecycle-based water accounting are urgently needed to safeguard global water security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Policy
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2026.233
Primary Topic
Green IT and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water footprint of large AI models: risks to global water security and sustainable optimization strategies

Sharfan Upaul, Tahdia Tahmid
Water Policy
Green IT and Sustainability
article

Water footprint of large AI models: risks to global water security and sustainable optimization strategies

Sharfan Upaul, Tahdia Tahmid
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Diagram linking AI model training and inference to lifecycle water use, estimated at 4.2–6.6 billion m³ annually by 2027, and showing water reuse, efficient cooling, smarter workloads, and standardized reporting as strategies to protect global water security. The rapid proliferation of large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) models has introduced a significant yet underexamined environmental challenge: freshwater consumption. This narrative review synthesizes scientific literature, industry sustainability reports, and case studies to quantify the water footprint of AI systems across their full lifecycle, from semiconductor fabrication and data center operations to electricity generation and supply chains. Direct water use occurs primarily through evaporative and liquid cooling in data centers, where a single large facility can consume 11,000–19,000m3/day. Indirect water use is embedded in electricity generation and chip manufacturing, with advanced fabrication plants drawing 10,000–37,000m3/day. Major technology companies, including Google, Microsoft, and Meta, collectively consume billions of cubic meters in 2022–2024, with consumption rising alongside accelerating AI deployment. Critically, over 52% of the world's top 100 data centers are projected to be located in high water stress regions by 2030, where AI infrastructure increasingly competes with agricultural, municipal, and ecological needs. Sustainable alternatives, including immersion cooling, nonpotable water reuse, and AI-driven workload optimization, offer measurable reductions but remain inconsistently adopted. The direct and indirect water footprints of AI models during their entire lifecycle are reviewed. Two of the main direct water usage sources are semiconductor manufacturing and data center cooling. Clip manufacturing and electricity generation significantly increase the indirect water footprint of AI. In areas with scarce freshwater supplies, the growth of AI technology may worsen water stress. Standardized reporting frameworks and lifecycle-based water accounting are urgently needed to safeguard global water security.

Water Policy
Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Green IT and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon