The Philosophical Background of the Criticisms of the Renaissance Humanist Lorenzo Valla: On Church Authority and the Latin Language

This study examines the philosophical foundations of Lorenzo Valla’s critiques of ecclesiastical authority and Latin learning. While previous studies have often treated his philology, theology, and criticism of scholasticism separately, this article analyses their shared humanist basis. Valla challenged certain forms of scholastic abstraction and Aristotelian logic, favouring rhetoric, historical inquiry, and close textual analysis. In the Elegantiae linguae Latinae, he sought to restore Latin according to classical standards and emphasised the relationship between language and thought. His analysis of the Donation of Constantine showed how philology could question inherited claims of Church authority. Rather than directly anticipating the Reformation, some of his criticisms later resonated with Reformation debates. The study argues that Valla transformed philology into a broader critical method for reassessing linguistic, theological, and institutional traditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intellectual Discourse
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v34i3.2629
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Philosophical Background of the Criticisms of the Renaissance Humanist Lorenzo Valla: On Church Authority and the Latin Language

Süleyman Ertan TAĞMAN, Bilge Salur, Ekin Kaynak Iltar, Banu Çetin Ünal
Intellectual Discourse
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

The Philosophical Background of the Criticisms of the Renaissance Humanist Lorenzo Valla: On Church Authority and the Latin Language

Süleyman Ertan TAĞMAN, Bilge Salur, Ekin Kaynak Iltar, Banu Çetin Ünal
article en

Abstract

This study examines the philosophical foundations of Lorenzo Valla’s critiques of ecclesiastical authority and Latin learning. While previous studies have often treated his philology, theology, and criticism of scholasticism separately, this article analyses their shared humanist basis. Valla challenged certain forms of scholastic abstraction and Aristotelian logic, favouring rhetoric, historical inquiry, and close textual analysis. In the Elegantiae linguae Latinae, he sought to restore Latin according to classical standards and emphasised the relationship between language and thought. His analysis of the Donation of Constantine showed how philology could question inherited claims of Church authority. Rather than directly anticipating the Reformation, some of his criticisms later resonated with Reformation debates. The study argues that Valla transformed philology into a broader critical method for reassessing linguistic, theological, and institutional traditions.

Intellectual DiscourseVol. 34(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon