From Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) to Intrinsic Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)

ABSTRACT Water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) is widely used to assess breathability in skin‐interfaced electronics. In gravimetric wet‐cup tests, however, the measured flux depends on transport through both the membrane and the apparatus. Apparatus resistance can dominate measurements of highly permeable membranes. Evaporation, headspace transport, membrane permeation, and external vapor spreading are modeled as resistances in series under a common chemical‐potential driving force. The apparatus coefficients are calibrated using open‐cup measurements in the same setup, independently of the reference permeability. For poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes, where membrane resistance dominates, both a literature air‐gap correction and the calibrated model reduce deviations from the reference. For a highly permeable anion‐exchange membrane (AEM), the air‐gap correction becomes unstable. Relative to a dynamic sweep‐cell reference, the calibrated model reduces mean absolute relative deviation from 49.8% for classical conversion to 6.2%. It also provides model‐based criteria for geometry selection and measurement duration, together with a procedure for converting WVTR to water vapor permeability (WVP).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.75578
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) to Intrinsic Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)

Rui Huang, Hongbian Li, Nanshu Lu, Krishnaswamy Ravi‐Chandar et al.
Advanced Materials
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
article

From Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) to Intrinsic Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)

Rui Huang, Hongbian Li, Nanshu Lu, Krishnaswamy Ravi‐Chandar, Xianke Feng, Winston Wang, Benny D. Freeman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) is widely used to assess breathability in skin‐interfaced electronics. In gravimetric wet‐cup tests, however, the measured flux depends on transport through both the membrane and the apparatus. Apparatus resistance can dominate measurements of highly permeable membranes. Evaporation, headspace transport, membrane permeation, and external vapor spreading are modeled as resistances in series under a common chemical‐potential driving force. The apparatus coefficients are calibrated using open‐cup measurements in the same setup, independently of the reference permeability. For poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes, where membrane resistance dominates, both a literature air‐gap correction and the calibrated model reduce deviations from the reference. For a highly permeable anion‐exchange membrane (AEM), the air‐gap correction becomes unstable. Relative to a dynamic sweep‐cell reference, the calibrated model reduces mean absolute relative deviation from 49.8% for classical conversion to 6.2%. It also provides model‐based criteria for geometry selection and measurement duration, together with a procedure for converting WVTR to water vapor permeability (WVP).

Advanced Materials
Texas Materials Institute (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon