Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) in Older Adults with Cardiometabolic Disease: A STOPP/START Criteria-Based Analysis

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are a common issue in older adults. Older adults often require multiple medications to manage cardiometabolic disease. This study aimed to identify potentially inappropriate medications and potential inappropriate omissions using STOPP/START criteria in older adult patients with cardiometabolic disease. We conducted an observational analytical study using retrospective data at a secondary care teaching hospital in Sukoharjo, Central Java. We included older adult patients admitted to the inpatient wards between January and June 2022. The prescriptions were analyzed using the STOPP/START Criteria 2016. The Chi-square test analysis was performed to examine the association between the number of drugs and the occurrence of PIMs. We included 97 geriatric inpatients. All patients received at least 5 drugs during each admission, 35.06% were classified as having hyperpolypharmacy. Among the 97 patients, 36.08% had PIM prescriptions, and 29.89% had PPOs. There was a statistically significant association between the number of drugs and PIMs in older adults. Compared with patients receiving > 10 medications, those receiving 5–10 medications had lower odds of PIM use (OR 0.409, 95% CI 0.173–0.969; p = 0.040). These findings highlight high medication burden as an important marker for targeted medication review in geriatric inpatients, particularly those with cardiometabolic multimorbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sciences of Pharmacy
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58920/sciphar0504750
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) in Older Adults with Cardiometabolic Disease: A STOPP/START Criteria-Based Analysis

Yeni Farida, Rizki Taufany
Sciences of Pharmacy
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) in Older Adults with Cardiometabolic Disease: A STOPP/START Criteria-Based Analysis

Yeni Farida, Rizki Taufany
article en

Abstract

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are a common issue in older adults. Older adults often require multiple medications to manage cardiometabolic disease. This study aimed to identify potentially inappropriate medications and potential inappropriate omissions using STOPP/START criteria in older adult patients with cardiometabolic disease. We conducted an observational analytical study using retrospective data at a secondary care teaching hospital in Sukoharjo, Central Java. We included older adult patients admitted to the inpatient wards between January and June 2022. The prescriptions were analyzed using the STOPP/START Criteria 2016. The Chi-square test analysis was performed to examine the association between the number of drugs and the occurrence of PIMs. We included 97 geriatric inpatients. All patients received at least 5 drugs during each admission, 35.06% were classified as having hyperpolypharmacy. Among the 97 patients, 36.08% had PIM prescriptions, and 29.89% had PPOs. There was a statistically significant association between the number of drugs and PIMs in older adults. Compared with patients receiving > 10 medications, those receiving 5–10 medications had lower odds of PIM use (OR 0.409, 95% CI 0.173–0.969; p = 0.040). These findings highlight high medication burden as an important marker for targeted medication review in geriatric inpatients, particularly those with cardiometabolic multimorbidity.

Sciences of PharmacyVol. 5(4)
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon