AI in patient education: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient information guides produced by ChatGPT versus Google Gemini for common haematology conditions

Background: Haematological disorders encompass a diverse range of conditions affecting blood and blood-forming organs. Educating Patients is crucial in managing these disorders, enabling individuals to understand their conditions, associated complications, and preventive measures. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to progress, chatbots such as ChatGPT (CG) and Google Gemini (GG) offer readily available patient information. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was performed from January 15, 2025, to January 22, 2025. Six haematological conditions were selected. Patient education materials were created using CG (version 4.0) and GG, following standardized prompts. The generated texts were analysed for readability, similarity, and reliability with the use of Flesch-Kincaid Calculator (FKC), Quill Bot Plagiarism Tool (QPT) and Modified DISCERN score, respectively. Results: The study demonstrated no significant difference between the CG and GG in word count (WC), sentence count (SC), readability score, or reliability score in the statistical evaluation. The CG demonstrated a slightly higher ease-of-understanding score, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.175). Conclusions: AI tools including CG and GG have an important role in educating patients by delivering quick and structured information on haematological conditions. Future studies should explore the role of AI in other medical domains and investigate ways to enhance AI-generated patient education materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264170
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in patient education: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient information guides produced by ChatGPT versus Google Gemini for common haematology conditions

Sri Harini S, Anjana Kurian, Eda Sai Venkata Teja, Ayesha Shafiya et al.
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI in patient education: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient information guides produced by ChatGPT versus Google Gemini for common haematology conditions

Sri Harini S, Anjana Kurian, Eda Sai Venkata Teja, Ayesha Shafiya, Nithin Reji, Sujitha Nagabhyru, Himabindu Dande
article en

Abstract

Background: Haematological disorders encompass a diverse range of conditions affecting blood and blood-forming organs. Educating Patients is crucial in managing these disorders, enabling individuals to understand their conditions, associated complications, and preventive measures. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to progress, chatbots such as ChatGPT (CG) and Google Gemini (GG) offer readily available patient information. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was performed from January 15, 2025, to January 22, 2025. Six haematological conditions were selected. Patient education materials were created using CG (version 4.0) and GG, following standardized prompts. The generated texts were analysed for readability, similarity, and reliability with the use of Flesch-Kincaid Calculator (FKC), Quill Bot Plagiarism Tool (QPT) and Modified DISCERN score, respectively. Results: The study demonstrated no significant difference between the CG and GG in word count (WC), sentence count (SC), readability score, or reliability score in the statistical evaluation. The CG demonstrated a slightly higher ease-of-understanding score, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.175). Conclusions: AI tools including CG and GG have an important role in educating patients by delivering quick and structured information on haematological conditions. Future studies should explore the role of AI in other medical domains and investigate ways to enhance AI-generated patient education materials.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 14(11)
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Medical College Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon