Cold Boot Continuity as a Deployment Primitive

Long-running agentic work commonly appears continuous only while one conversation, process, provider, or context window remains available. When that surface ends, summaries and prompts attempt to reconstruct what mattered. They may preserve narrative direction while losing exact artifacts, unresolved alternatives, authority boundaries, custody, external state, intermediate evidence, and the reasons a transition was admitted or refused. This paper proposes Cold Boot Continuity as a deployment primitive: the capacity for a newly instantiated runtime, beginning without the predecessor's conversational memory, to recover enough verified semantic, artifact, task, custody, authority, environment, and evidence state to resume the same governed work under an explicit claim ceiling. Cold boot does not mean bit-identical internal cognition, deterministic continuation, or automatic authority transfer. A replacement model may reason differently, lack required capabilities, discover that the archive is stale, or legitimately refuse to continue. Continuity is instead preservation of identified obligations, exact heads, admissibility decisions, open alternatives, work custody, authority constraints, evidence debts, and revision lineage through a verified resumption protocol. The paper distinguishes bootability, orientability, resumability, semantic continuity, authority validity, and evidenced continuity. It specifies a context capsule as a bounded projection from the Governed Meaning Base (GMB), not as the whole corpus or an executable grant. It also defines failure modes, adversarial tests, the universal realization funnel, and integration with project lineage, receipted reasoning, context governance, and work custody. This is a conceptual architecture and verification program. The source names a JN reactor and a historical Constitutional Crystallization Framework (CCF); this revision applies the author-confirmed terminology lineage CCF -> CMB -> GMB while preserving JN reactor identity as an unresolved system candidate. No named implementation is certified by this paper.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23847489
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cold Boot Continuity as a Deployment Primitive

Adam Ableman
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Cold Boot Continuity as a Deployment Primitive

Adam Ableman
article en

Abstract

Long-running agentic work commonly appears continuous only while one conversation, process, provider, or context window remains available. When that surface ends, summaries and prompts attempt to reconstruct what mattered. They may preserve narrative direction while losing exact artifacts, unresolved alternatives, authority boundaries, custody, external state, intermediate evidence, and the reasons a transition was admitted or refused. This paper proposes Cold Boot Continuity as a deployment primitive: the capacity for a newly instantiated runtime, beginning without the predecessor's conversational memory, to recover enough verified semantic, artifact, task, custody, authority, environment, and evidence state to resume the same governed work under an explicit claim ceiling. Cold boot does not mean bit-identical internal cognition, deterministic continuation, or automatic authority transfer. A replacement model may reason differently, lack required capabilities, discover that the archive is stale, or legitimately refuse to continue. Continuity is instead preservation of identified obligations, exact heads, admissibility decisions, open alternatives, work custody, authority constraints, evidence debts, and revision lineage through a verified resumption protocol. The paper distinguishes bootability, orientability, resumability, semantic continuity, authority validity, and evidenced continuity. It specifies a context capsule as a bounded projection from the Governed Meaning Base (GMB), not as the whole corpus or an executable grant. It also defines failure modes, adversarial tests, the universal realization funnel, and integration with project lineage, receipted reasoning, context governance, and work custody. This is a conceptual architecture and verification program. The source names a JN reactor and a historical Constitutional Crystallization Framework (CCF); this revision applies the author-confirmed terminology lineage CCF -> CMB -> GMB while preserving JN reactor identity as an unresolved system candidate. No named implementation is certified by this paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Cold Boot Continuity as a Deployment Primitive — Adam Ableman · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS