Bridging Languages, Rebuilding Communication: Best Practices for Assessing and Treating Discourse for Bilingual People with Aphasia

A considerable proportion of the global adult population is bilingual; however, research on aphasia and language processing remains predominantly centered on monolingual speakers, leading to reduced understanding and guidance about bilingual aphasia. Bilingual aphasia is not equivalent to monolingual aphasia, as bilinguals process each language differently from monolinguals. As such, they are likely to have different error patterns and recovery processes. Best practice for assessing bilingual individuals with aphasia requires evaluating all languages they have sufficiently acquired. Because standardized normative tools are not available for many language combinations or even for numerous individual languages, clinicians can derive necessary insights into a bilingual patient’s linguistic strengths and impairments through systematic discourse sampling. Consequently, we provide best practice recommendations for assessing and treating discourse production in bilingual aphasia. We synthesize current practices in language assessment and treatment of discourse production for bilingual aphasia populations, and provide clinically applicable recommendations for selecting, administering, coding, and interpreting discourse assessments across languages. We also provide recommendations for selecting and adapting discourse interventions, treatment languages, and cross-language targets within the constraints of multilingual clinical service delivery.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7c96m_v1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Bridging Languages, Rebuilding Communication: Best Practices for Assessing and Treating Discourse for Bilingual People with Aphasia

Danielle Fahey, Reem S. W. Alyahya, Saryu Sharma, M K Niharika
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
preprint

Bridging Languages, Rebuilding Communication: Best Practices for Assessing and Treating Discourse for Bilingual People with Aphasia

Danielle Fahey, Reem S. W. Alyahya, Saryu Sharma, M K Niharika
preprint en

Abstract

A considerable proportion of the global adult population is bilingual; however, research on aphasia and language processing remains predominantly centered on monolingual speakers, leading to reduced understanding and guidance about bilingual aphasia. Bilingual aphasia is not equivalent to monolingual aphasia, as bilinguals process each language differently from monolinguals. As such, they are likely to have different error patterns and recovery processes. Best practice for assessing bilingual individuals with aphasia requires evaluating all languages they have sufficiently acquired. Because standardized normative tools are not available for many language combinations or even for numerous individual languages, clinicians can derive necessary insights into a bilingual patient’s linguistic strengths and impairments through systematic discourse sampling. Consequently, we provide best practice recommendations for assessing and treating discourse production in bilingual aphasia. We synthesize current practices in language assessment and treatment of discourse production for bilingual aphasia populations, and provide clinically applicable recommendations for selecting, administering, coding, and interpreting discourse assessments across languages. We also provide recommendations for selecting and adapting discourse interventions, treatment languages, and cross-language targets within the constraints of multilingual clinical service delivery.

Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon