Optimized Cuttings Removal for Mechanical Cavity-Making in Downward Boreholes: A Strategy for Coal Seam Permeability Enhancement

Abstract Mechanical cavity-making has been applied in many coal mines in China because it can improve pressure relief and increase the permeability of coal around boreholes. However, for downward cross-seam boreholes, the application of this technology is still restricted, mainly because cuttings are difficult to remove during cavity-making. To address this problem, this study combined numerical simulation with field tests to examine the cuttings output required for effective cavity-making and to compare the gas extraction performance under different cuttings-removal methods. The simulation results indicated that the required cuttings output was about 0.30 t / m . Field tests then were carried out using three cuttings-removal methods. Among them, the combined high-flow mud pump and air compressor method performed best, and the cuttings output reached 0.45 t / m . Boreholes treated with this method also had better gas extraction performance than those under the other two methods. The average gas extraction concentration reached 67%, and the average pure gas extraction rate reached 0.39 m 3 / min . These results show that improving cuttings removal is important for the field application of downward borehole mechanical cavity-making, and can provide a practical reference for enhancing coal seam permeability and improving coalbed gas extraction in low-permeability coal seams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Engineering
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jleed9.eyeng-7073
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized Cuttings Removal for Mechanical Cavity-Making in Downward Boreholes: A Strategy for Coal Seam Permeability Enhancement

Fenghua An, Yaowu Jia, Liguo Wang, Zhaoxia Si et al.
Journal of Energy Engineering
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

Optimized Cuttings Removal for Mechanical Cavity-Making in Downward Boreholes: A Strategy for Coal Seam Permeability Enhancement

Fenghua An, Yaowu Jia, Liguo Wang, Zhaoxia Si, Haidong Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mechanical cavity-making has been applied in many coal mines in China because it can improve pressure relief and increase the permeability of coal around boreholes. However, for downward cross-seam boreholes, the application of this technology is still restricted, mainly because cuttings are difficult to remove during cavity-making. To address this problem, this study combined numerical simulation with field tests to examine the cuttings output required for effective cavity-making and to compare the gas extraction performance under different cuttings-removal methods. The simulation results indicated that the required cuttings output was about 0.30 t / m . Field tests then were carried out using three cuttings-removal methods. Among them, the combined high-flow mud pump and air compressor method performed best, and the cuttings output reached 0.45 t / m . Boreholes treated with this method also had better gas extraction performance than those under the other two methods. The average gas extraction concentration reached 67%, and the average pure gas extraction rate reached 0.39 m 3 / min . These results show that improving cuttings removal is important for the field application of downward borehole mechanical cavity-making, and can provide a practical reference for enhancing coal seam permeability and improving coalbed gas extraction in low-permeability coal seams.

Journal of Energy EngineeringVol. 153(1)
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon