Evaluation of Micromobility Route Criteria Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

The increasing use of micromobility vehicles as an alternative transportation mode in urban areas necessitates serious attention toward infrastructure safety. However, the route development process is often hindered by the absence of a systematic approach to evaluating critical design criteria. This study aims to identify and prioritize micromobility route design criteria to provide a robust planning foundation. The research methodology employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) via the BPMSG Excel Template to analyze expert judgments through pairwise comparisons. Four primary criteria were evaluated: infrastructure quality, user safety, local policy compliance, and accessibility. The analysis results indicate that accessibility is the most influential criterion, recording the highest priority weight of 26.51%, particularly concerning connectivity to public transportation. Although a level of inconsistency was observed within the accessibility criterion (CR > 0.10) reflecting varying expert perspectives between public pathway access and modal connectivity the overall findings provide a significant and valid overview of priorities. The contribution of this study offers a validated decision-support tool for urban planners and campus managers to develop safe, sustainable, and regulation-compliant micromobility path, thereby supporting modern urban transportation goals.