Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Food‐Insecure Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Pediatric and young adult (PYA) kidney transplant recipients face substantial cardiometabolic risk related to long-term immunosuppression and are vulnerable to food insecurity (FI). Produce prescription programs may improve dietary quality and reduce FI, but their feasibility and impact in pediatric kidney transplant recipients are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a 6-month fruit and vegetable prescription program among food-insecure PYA kidney transplant recipients at a single U.S. pediatric center. Participants received monthly produce vouchers via restricted-use benefit cards redeemable for fruits and vegetables. Primary outcomes included feasibility (enrollment and voucher redemption), acceptability, and safety (hyperkalemia episodes and incidence of food-borne illness). Exploratory outcomes included changes in FI, self-reported dietary intake, and cardiometabolic measures. RESULTS: Nineteen participants (median age 19 years, range 11-23) were enrolled, representing 100% of eligible patients approached; 18 were able to activate their card and were included in analyses. Voucher utilization was high, with 86% redeeming at least 50% of voucher funds. Acceptability was favorable: 89% of participants reported a highly positive experience and a maximal likelihood of recommending the program. No episodes of hyperkalemia occurred during the intervention. FI decreased from 53% at baseline to 22% at follow-up, though this difference was not statistically significant. Fruit and vegetable intake did not increase over the intervention. Serum bicarbonate increased following the intervention (24.97 vs. 22.07 mEq/L, p < 0.001), while BMI, blood pressure, and other electrolytes remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: A produce prescription program was feasible, safe, and highly acceptable among PYA kidney transplant recipients with FI and warrants evaluation in larger studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Transplantation
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.70517
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Food‐Insecure Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

Ronli Levi, Hilary Kessler Seligman, Eva Maria Glenn Lecea, Laura Plantinga et al.
Pediatric Transplantation
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Food‐Insecure Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

Ronli Levi, Hilary Kessler Seligman, Eva Maria Glenn Lecea, Laura Plantinga, Erica Winnicki, Delphine S. Tuot, Jennifer L. Evans
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric and young adult (PYA) kidney transplant recipients face substantial cardiometabolic risk related to long-term immunosuppression and are vulnerable to food insecurity (FI). Produce prescription programs may improve dietary quality and reduce FI, but their feasibility and impact in pediatric kidney transplant recipients are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a 6-month fruit and vegetable prescription program among food-insecure PYA kidney transplant recipients at a single U.S. pediatric center. Participants received monthly produce vouchers via restricted-use benefit cards redeemable for fruits and vegetables. Primary outcomes included feasibility (enrollment and voucher redemption), acceptability, and safety (hyperkalemia episodes and incidence of food-borne illness). Exploratory outcomes included changes in FI, self-reported dietary intake, and cardiometabolic measures. RESULTS: Nineteen participants (median age 19 years, range 11-23) were enrolled, representing 100% of eligible patients approached; 18 were able to activate their card and were included in analyses. Voucher utilization was high, with 86% redeeming at least 50% of voucher funds. Acceptability was favorable: 89% of participants reported a highly positive experience and a maximal likelihood of recommending the program. No episodes of hyperkalemia occurred during the intervention. FI decreased from 53% at baseline to 22% at follow-up, though this difference was not statistically significant. Fruit and vegetable intake did not increase over the intervention. Serum bicarbonate increased following the intervention (24.97 vs. 22.07 mEq/L, p < 0.001), while BMI, blood pressure, and other electrolytes remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: A produce prescription program was feasible, safe, and highly acceptable among PYA kidney transplant recipients with FI and warrants evaluation in larger studies.

Pediatric TransplantationVol. 30(11)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Loma Linda University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon