Victimización digital y derecho penal: respuestas jurídicas frente al acoso, sextorsión y violencia tecnológica contemporánea

The expansion of digital technologies has reshaped intimidation, sexual coercion, and violations of privacy, challenging traditional categories of criminal law. This study examines contemporary criminal law responses to digital harassment, sextortion, and image-based sexual abuse, identifying regulatory, evidentiary, jurisdictional, and victimological limitations documented between 2021 and 2026. Drawing on a qualitative synthesis of twenty preselected studies, the analysis addresses five dimensions: criminalization, consent, electronic evidence, criminal investigation and prosecution, and victim protection. Findings indicate legislative progress alongside persistent difficulties in defining criminal offenses, recognizing the enduring nature of harm, and regulating synthetic sexual images. These challenges intensify when intimate content remains accessible and circulates repeatedly across digital environments without consent. Operational challenges include identifying perpetrators, preserving digital evidence, facilitating cross-border cooperation, and ensuring specialized training for legal practitioners. From a victimological perspective, reporting and punishment do not necessarily end abuse or guarantee comprehensive redress. The study concludes that effective criminal justice responses require integrating legal recognition of harm, investigative capacity, and timely victim protection, while safeguarding procedural rights. It proposes an integrated framework to guide proportionate legal reforms and cautions against equating legislative expansion with empirically demonstrated improvements in institutional responses. Such improvements must be established through rigorous outcome evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic and Social Science Research
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v6/n4/289
Primary Topic
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Victimización digital y derecho penal: respuestas jurídicas frente al acoso, sextorsión y violencia tecnológica contemporánea

Marcos Vinicio Espinoza-Guillén, Jefferson Romeo Arcentales-Espinoza, Susana Valeria Idrovo-Mosquera
5 links
Journal of Economic and Social Science Research
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
article

Victimización digital y derecho penal: respuestas jurídicas frente al acoso, sextorsión y violencia tecnológica contemporánea

Marcos Vinicio Espinoza-Guillén, Jefferson Romeo Arcentales-Espinoza, Susana Valeria Idrovo-Mosquera
article en

Abstract

The expansion of digital technologies has reshaped intimidation, sexual coercion, and violations of privacy, challenging traditional categories of criminal law. This study examines contemporary criminal law responses to digital harassment, sextortion, and image-based sexual abuse, identifying regulatory, evidentiary, jurisdictional, and victimological limitations documented between 2021 and 2026. Drawing on a qualitative synthesis of twenty preselected studies, the analysis addresses five dimensions: criminalization, consent, electronic evidence, criminal investigation and prosecution, and victim protection. Findings indicate legislative progress alongside persistent difficulties in defining criminal offenses, recognizing the enduring nature of harm, and regulating synthetic sexual images. These challenges intensify when intimate content remains accessible and circulates repeatedly across digital environments without consent. Operational challenges include identifying perpetrators, preserving digital evidence, facilitating cross-border cooperation, and ensuring specialized training for legal practitioners. From a victimological perspective, reporting and punishment do not necessarily end abuse or guarantee comprehensive redress. The study concludes that effective criminal justice responses require integrating legal recognition of harm, investigative capacity, and timely victim protection, while safeguarding procedural rights. It proposes an integrated framework to guide proportionate legal reforms and cautions against equating legislative expansion with empirically demonstrated improvements in institutional responses. Such improvements must be established through rigorous outcome evaluations.

Journal of Economic and Social Science ResearchVol. 6(4)
Universidad Católica de Cuenca (EC)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon