When Does Contract Farming Improve Farmer Welfare? The Role of Commercialisation in Ghana's Rice Sector

ABSTRACT Contract farming is widely promoted as a means of connecting smallholders to agricultural markets, reducing market uncertainty and improving farm‐household welfare. Although irrigated rice farming may reduce production‐related risks, farmers remain exposed to market uncertainty, underscoring the potential relevance of contract farming arrangements. Yet whether participation is associated with higher income, and whether commercialisation explains this relationship, remain important empirical questions. This study pursued this gap by examining the association between contract farming and per capita rice income using cross‐sectional data from 286 irrigated rice farmers in Ghana's Upper East Region. Instrumental‐variable techniques and double/debiased machine learning are employed to address potential endogeneity and functional‐form concerns. The results consistently show a positive association between contract‐farming participation and per capita rice income across the estimated specifications. Mechanism analysis reveals a nonlinear, threshold‐dependent pathway: commercialisation does not meaningfully transmit per capita income gains at low levels of output marketed but becomes a significant conduit at higher levels. This implies that higher per capita income materialises primarily through deeper market integration. Subgroup estimates also suggest variation in the association, with larger point estimates among smallholders, male farmers, farmers with access to extension services and those positioned at higher levels of the income distribution. The study concludes that promoting contract farming without commercialisation is insufficient for higher per capita income. Therefore, policy efforts should consider improving farmers' market orientation while implementing targeted interventions, especially for female and marginalised farmers without access to extension services, to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes from contract farming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food and Energy Security
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70345
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Does Contract Farming Improve Farmer Welfare? The Role of Commercialisation in Ghana's Rice Sector

Patrick Muotono Izideen Maanikuu, Emmanuel Kwablah Apiors, Samuel Kwabena Chaa Kyire, John K.M. Kuwornu et al.
Food and Energy Security
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

When Does Contract Farming Improve Farmer Welfare? The Role of Commercialisation in Ghana's Rice Sector

Patrick Muotono Izideen Maanikuu, Emmanuel Kwablah Apiors, Samuel Kwabena Chaa Kyire, John K.M. Kuwornu, Francis Hypolite Kemeze, Edward Martey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contract farming is widely promoted as a means of connecting smallholders to agricultural markets, reducing market uncertainty and improving farm‐household welfare. Although irrigated rice farming may reduce production‐related risks, farmers remain exposed to market uncertainty, underscoring the potential relevance of contract farming arrangements. Yet whether participation is associated with higher income, and whether commercialisation explains this relationship, remain important empirical questions. This study pursued this gap by examining the association between contract farming and per capita rice income using cross‐sectional data from 286 irrigated rice farmers in Ghana's Upper East Region. Instrumental‐variable techniques and double/debiased machine learning are employed to address potential endogeneity and functional‐form concerns. The results consistently show a positive association between contract‐farming participation and per capita rice income across the estimated specifications. Mechanism analysis reveals a nonlinear, threshold‐dependent pathway: commercialisation does not meaningfully transmit per capita income gains at low levels of output marketed but becomes a significant conduit at higher levels. This implies that higher per capita income materialises primarily through deeper market integration. Subgroup estimates also suggest variation in the association, with larger point estimates among smallholders, male farmers, farmers with access to extension services and those positioned at higher levels of the income distribution. The study concludes that promoting contract farming without commercialisation is insufficient for higher per capita income. Therefore, policy efforts should consider improving farmers' market orientation while implementing targeted interventions, especially for female and marginalised farmers without access to extension services, to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes from contract farming.

Food and Energy SecurityVol. 15(6)
Central University of Punjab (IN), African Development Bank Group (CI), University of Energy and Natural Resources (GH), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH), CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (GH), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon