TAXATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES IN UZBEKISTAN AND SLOVAKIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

This study compares the taxation of small businesses in Uzbekistan and Slovakia under the rules in force on 27 October 2026. Uzbekistan taxes most small firms on gross revenue through a 4% turnover tax (1% for individual entrepreneurs) that replaces both value-added tax (VAT) and profit tax, whereas Slovakia taxes net profit at a reduced 10% corporate rate, backed by a minimum tax and, for sole traders, a 60% lump-sum expense deduction. Using comparative legal analysis and stylised tax simulations, the study finds that Uzbekistan's turnover tax imposes a heavier direct-tax burden than Slovakia's profit tax whenever a company's net margin falls below about 34%, and that the gap becomes severe in low-margin trade. The simulations also show that Slovakia's mandatory social contributions make it far more costly for the smallest sole traders, and that part of Uzbekistan's turnover tax substitutes for VAT. The study recommends that Uzbekistan open a profit-based option, measured on actual costs, for low-margin firms below the turnover-tax threshold, while retaining its low fixed social contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23829111
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TAXATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES IN UZBEKISTAN AND SLOVAKIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Jasmina Nurmamatova Ulug'bek qizi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

TAXATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES IN UZBEKISTAN AND SLOVAKIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Jasmina Nurmamatova Ulug'bek qizi
article en

Abstract

This study compares the taxation of small businesses in Uzbekistan and Slovakia under the rules in force on 27 October 2026. Uzbekistan taxes most small firms on gross revenue through a 4% turnover tax (1% for individual entrepreneurs) that replaces both value-added tax (VAT) and profit tax, whereas Slovakia taxes net profit at a reduced 10% corporate rate, backed by a minimum tax and, for sole traders, a 60% lump-sum expense deduction. Using comparative legal analysis and stylised tax simulations, the study finds that Uzbekistan's turnover tax imposes a heavier direct-tax burden than Slovakia's profit tax whenever a company's net margin falls below about 34%, and that the gap becomes severe in low-margin trade. The simulations also show that Slovakia's mandatory social contributions make it far more costly for the smallest sole traders, and that part of Uzbekistan's turnover tax substitutes for VAT. The study recommends that Uzbekistan open a profit-based option, measured on actual costs, for low-margin firms below the turnover-tax threshold, while retaining its low fixed social contribution.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon