Outcomes of autogenous arteriovenous fistula versus prosthetic arteriovenous graft in adult patients with end-stage renal disease: analysis of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the commonly preferred permanent vascular access for hemodialysis. However, differences in long-term outcomes between AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are not well understood. This study aimed to compare patency and outcomes between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving AVFs or AVGs. This retrospective study included adults with ESRD who received an AVF or AVG between 2001 and 2016 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Restricted mean time lost (RMTL) was used to compare primary and secondary patency failure at 1, 3, and 5 years, while Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate mortality and complications at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year. A total of 8,730 patients were included. After IPTW, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Compared with AVFs, AVGs were associated with greater RMTL due to primary patency failure at 1, 3, and 5 years (differences: 1.00, 4.89, and 8.28 months, respectively; all p < 0.001) and secondary patency failure (0.39, 2.90, and 6.72 months, respectively; all p < 0.001). AVGs were also associated with higher mortality at 30 days (hazards ratio [HR], 2.88; 95% CI, 1.60–5.19), 90 days (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03–2.36), and 1 year (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.38–2.15). In addition, higher hazards of infection at 30 days (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.17–3.21) and of sepsis (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04–1.82) and infection (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02–1.54) at 1 year were observed with AVGs. AVFs were associated with better long-term patency and lower risks of mortality and infectious complications than prosthetic AVGs. These findings support preferential use of AVFs when clinically feasible, while emphasizing individualized vascular access selection. N/A.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nephrology
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05480-1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of autogenous arteriovenous fistula versus prosthetic arteriovenous graft in adult patients with end-stage renal disease: analysis of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database

Ying-Chun Lee, Huai-Hsuan Tung, Chen‐Yen Chien, Pei-Chen Wu et al.
BMC Nephrology
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Outcomes of autogenous arteriovenous fistula versus prosthetic arteriovenous graft in adult patients with end-stage renal disease: analysis of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database

Ying-Chun Lee, Huai-Hsuan Tung, Chen‐Yen Chien, Pei-Chen Wu, Yu-Huei Lin
article en

Abstract

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the commonly preferred permanent vascular access for hemodialysis. However, differences in long-term outcomes between AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are not well understood. This study aimed to compare patency and outcomes between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving AVFs or AVGs. This retrospective study included adults with ESRD who received an AVF or AVG between 2001 and 2016 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Restricted mean time lost (RMTL) was used to compare primary and secondary patency failure at 1, 3, and 5 years, while Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate mortality and complications at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year. A total of 8,730 patients were included. After IPTW, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Compared with AVFs, AVGs were associated with greater RMTL due to primary patency failure at 1, 3, and 5 years (differences: 1.00, 4.89, and 8.28 months, respectively; all p < 0.001) and secondary patency failure (0.39, 2.90, and 6.72 months, respectively; all p < 0.001). AVGs were also associated with higher mortality at 30 days (hazards ratio [HR], 2.88; 95% CI, 1.60–5.19), 90 days (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03–2.36), and 1 year (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.38–2.15). In addition, higher hazards of infection at 30 days (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.17–3.21) and of sepsis (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04–1.82) and infection (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02–1.54) at 1 year were observed with AVGs. AVFs were associated with better long-term patency and lower risks of mortality and infectious complications than prosthetic AVGs. These findings support preferential use of AVFs when clinically feasible, while emphasizing individualized vascular access selection. N/A.

BMC Nephrology
Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW), Mackay Medical University (TW), Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon