ANALISIS GAYA BELAJAR HONEY & MUMFORD PADA SISWA KELAS IX MTs NEGERI 5 BANTUL

ABSTRACT The cognitive dynamics of madrasah students demand profound pedagogical sensitivity to ensure that knowledge transfer proceeds inclusively and aligns with individual needs. This study maps and elaborates the learning style tendencies of eighty-six grade nine pupils at MTs Negeri 5 Bantul through the theoretical lens of Honey and Mumford. Employing a quantitative approach with a descriptive survey design, data were gathered via a short-version dichotomous questionnaire encompassing four core psychological dimensions. Descriptive statistical procedures were utilized to compute means, standard deviations, percentage proportions, and classifications. Empirical findings confirm that the reflective typology occupies the highest rank with a mean score of 8.26 and a dominance share of 28%, followed sequentially by the pragmatic (7.80; 27%), theoretical (7.52; 26%), and activist variants (5.47; 19%). Categorization mapping situates the first three styles within high qualifications and the latter at a moderate level. These numerical insights underscore the urgency for educators to engineer adaptive instructional strategies, such as optimizing observational sessions and critical discussions within the classroom. ABSTRAK Dinamika kognitif peserta didik madrasah menuntut kepekaan pedagogis yang mendalam agar proses transfer pengetahuan dapat berjalan secara inklusif dan selaras dengan kebutuhan personal mereka. Penelitian ini digerakkan untuk memetakan serta menguraikan kecenderungan orientasi belajar delapan puluh enam subjek didik kelas IX di MTs Negeri 5 Bantul melalui kerangka teoretis Honey and Mumford. Menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berdesain survei deskriptif, seluruh informasi dikumpulkan lewat instrumen angket dikotomis versi pendek yang mencakup empat dimensi psikologis utama. Prosedur analisis data bertumpu pada kalkulasi statistik deskriptif guna mengekstrak nilai rata-rata, simpangan baku, proporsi persentase, serta kategorisasi kelas. Temuan empiris mengonfirmasi bahwa tipologi reflektif menempati urutan teratas dengan perolehan rerata 8,26 dan porsi dominasi 28%, yang disusul secara berturut-turut oleh varian pragmatis (7,80; 27%), teoretis (7,52; 26%), serta aktivis (5,47; 19%). Pengelompokan kategori menempatkan tiga tipe awal pada kualifikasi tinggi dan tipe terakhir pada tingkat sedang. Konstelasi data ini menyaratkan urgensi bagi para pendidik untuk merancang strategi pembelajaran yang adaptif, seperti mengoptimalkan sesi observasi dan diskusi kritis di ruang kelas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SECONDARY Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51878/secondary.v6i4.16583
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALISIS GAYA BELAJAR HONEY & MUMFORD PADA SISWA KELAS IX MTs NEGERI 5 BANTUL

Ujang Nendra Pratama, Qaila Ersita Al Putri Yani Yani, Emy Manna Fitriyani, Azizah Nurul Salsabila et al.
SECONDARY Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

ANALISIS GAYA BELAJAR HONEY & MUMFORD PADA SISWA KELAS IX MTs NEGERI 5 BANTUL

Ujang Nendra Pratama, Qaila Ersita Al Putri Yani Yani, Emy Manna Fitriyani, Azizah Nurul Salsabila, Dyah Tri Kusuma Wardani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The cognitive dynamics of madrasah students demand profound pedagogical sensitivity to ensure that knowledge transfer proceeds inclusively and aligns with individual needs. This study maps and elaborates the learning style tendencies of eighty-six grade nine pupils at MTs Negeri 5 Bantul through the theoretical lens of Honey and Mumford. Employing a quantitative approach with a descriptive survey design, data were gathered via a short-version dichotomous questionnaire encompassing four core psychological dimensions. Descriptive statistical procedures were utilized to compute means, standard deviations, percentage proportions, and classifications. Empirical findings confirm that the reflective typology occupies the highest rank with a mean score of 8.26 and a dominance share of 28%, followed sequentially by the pragmatic (7.80; 27%), theoretical (7.52; 26%), and activist variants (5.47; 19%). Categorization mapping situates the first three styles within high qualifications and the latter at a moderate level. These numerical insights underscore the urgency for educators to engineer adaptive instructional strategies, such as optimizing observational sessions and critical discussions within the classroom. ABSTRAK Dinamika kognitif peserta didik madrasah menuntut kepekaan pedagogis yang mendalam agar proses transfer pengetahuan dapat berjalan secara inklusif dan selaras dengan kebutuhan personal mereka. Penelitian ini digerakkan untuk memetakan serta menguraikan kecenderungan orientasi belajar delapan puluh enam subjek didik kelas IX di MTs Negeri 5 Bantul melalui kerangka teoretis Honey and Mumford. Menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berdesain survei deskriptif, seluruh informasi dikumpulkan lewat instrumen angket dikotomis versi pendek yang mencakup empat dimensi psikologis utama. Prosedur analisis data bertumpu pada kalkulasi statistik deskriptif guna mengekstrak nilai rata-rata, simpangan baku, proporsi persentase, serta kategorisasi kelas. Temuan empiris mengonfirmasi bahwa tipologi reflektif menempati urutan teratas dengan perolehan rerata 8,26 dan porsi dominasi 28%, yang disusul secara berturut-turut oleh varian pragmatis (7,80; 27%), teoretis (7,52; 26%), serta aktivis (5,47; 19%). Pengelompokan kategori menempatkan tiga tipe awal pada kualifikasi tinggi dan tipe terakhir pada tingkat sedang. Konstelasi data ini menyaratkan urgensi bagi para pendidik untuk merancang strategi pembelajaran yang adaptif, seperti mengoptimalkan sesi observasi dan diskusi kritis di ruang kelas.

SECONDARY Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MenengahVol. 6(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon