From categorizing to evaluating: Mapping the critical reading levels of English language students

Critical reading is increasingly recognized as a fundamental academic literacy skill that enables learners to analyze, interpret, and evaluate textual information beyond surface comprehension. Despite its importance in higher education, limited studies have examined the critical reading competencies of English language students within the Philippine context. Addressing this gap, the present study investigated the critical reading levels of Bachelor of Arts in English Language (BAEL) students in a state university in the Cordillera Administrative Region. Anchored in a quantitative descriptive design, the study utilized a validated and pilot-tested 40-item assessment tool measuring three dimensions of critical reading: categorizing, analyzing, and evaluating. A total of 241 respondents participated in the study through stratified cluster sampling. Descriptive statistics and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed to analyze differences according to year level and gender. Findings revealed that BAEL students demonstrated an overall high level of critical reading proficiency, with categorizing emerging as the strongest dimension, followed by evaluating and analyzing. Significant differences were found across year levels, particularly among second-year students, while no statistically significant differences were observed according to gender. Interestingly, queer students obtained the highest mean scores, suggesting the potential influence of diverse interpretive experiences on critical literacy practices. The findings underscore the multidimensional and developmental nature of critical reading and highlight the importance of pedagogical scaffolding, metacognitive reading strategies, and inclusive literacy instruction in fostering higher-order thinking skills among university learners. The study contributes to the growing discourse on critical literacy and academic reading in multilingual higher education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ELT Forum Journal of English Language Teaching
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v15i3.50059
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From categorizing to evaluating: Mapping the critical reading levels of English language students

Krisha Mecca M. Santiago, Mia Angela A. Paway, Joseph Quinto, Jessica S. Toralba
ELT Forum Journal of English Language Teaching
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

From categorizing to evaluating: Mapping the critical reading levels of English language students

Krisha Mecca M. Santiago, Mia Angela A. Paway, Joseph Quinto, Jessica S. Toralba
article en

Abstract

Critical reading is increasingly recognized as a fundamental academic literacy skill that enables learners to analyze, interpret, and evaluate textual information beyond surface comprehension. Despite its importance in higher education, limited studies have examined the critical reading competencies of English language students within the Philippine context. Addressing this gap, the present study investigated the critical reading levels of Bachelor of Arts in English Language (BAEL) students in a state university in the Cordillera Administrative Region. Anchored in a quantitative descriptive design, the study utilized a validated and pilot-tested 40-item assessment tool measuring three dimensions of critical reading: categorizing, analyzing, and evaluating. A total of 241 respondents participated in the study through stratified cluster sampling. Descriptive statistics and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed to analyze differences according to year level and gender. Findings revealed that BAEL students demonstrated an overall high level of critical reading proficiency, with categorizing emerging as the strongest dimension, followed by evaluating and analyzing. Significant differences were found across year levels, particularly among second-year students, while no statistically significant differences were observed according to gender. Interestingly, queer students obtained the highest mean scores, suggesting the potential influence of diverse interpretive experiences on critical literacy practices. The findings underscore the multidimensional and developmental nature of critical reading and highlight the importance of pedagogical scaffolding, metacognitive reading strategies, and inclusive literacy instruction in fostering higher-order thinking skills among university learners. The study contributes to the growing discourse on critical literacy and academic reading in multilingual higher education contexts.

ELT Forum Journal of English Language TeachingVol. 15(3)
Benguet State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
From categorizing to evaluating: Mapping the critical reading levels of English language students — Krisha Mecca M. Santiago, Mia Angela A. Paway, et al. · ELT Forum Journal of English Language Teaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS