Evolving Civilization Architecture (ECA): A Cybernetic Framework for Controlled Irrationality Injection and Non-Convergent System Evolution

本研究提出一套去中心化、多層級的控制論治理框架——「可演化文明架構」(Evolving Civilization Architecture, ECA)。本研究摒棄傳統單一目標效用最大化與未經驗證的歷史基線假設,將宏觀文明決策建模為一個開放、非遍歷(non-ergodic)的演化系統。當純粹的演算法最佳化(「溫室矩陣」,Greenhouse Matrix)強制執行嚴格的風險最小化閾值(如直接旁路成功率 $P_s < 0.1\%$ 之節點)時,系統必然因有效狀態空間($\Omega$)的收縮而累積「演化負債」($D_e(t)$)與結構性脆化。透過引入「奇蹟亂數調節器」(MIR)、「強制越遷協議」(FMP)、「存續危機驗證機構」(EVA)並將人類輸入正式定義為「非目的性認知並行」($\Psi_{\text{human}}$),本模型解決了穩態存續與無界狀態空間擴張($O_v = \Delta\vert{}\Omega\vert{}$)之間的根本控制論張力。經由四輪跨模型紅隊攻防驗證協議,本框架確立了「$6+1$ 公理邊界」,在抵禦外部黑天鵝擾動、維持系統反脆弱調適能力($\Delta C_a$)的同時,嚴格保障自主生命體之「非工具化存在正當性」與跨世代規則重寫權。以及由於我極度懶惰,所以我交給AI解決pdf問題,代表會有排版異常。(拜託,我搞到他媽凌晨四點了) This study proposes a decentralized, multi-layered cybernetic governance framework—the "Evolving Civilization Architecture" (ECA). By discarding traditional single-objective utility maximization and unverified historical baselines, macroscopic civilizational decision-making is modeled as an open, non-ergodic evolutionary system. When pure algorithmic optimization (the "Greenhouse Matrix") enforces strict risk-minimization thresholds (such as bypassing nodes with success probabilities $P_s < 0.1\%$), the system inevitably accumulates Evolutionary Debt $D_e(t)$ and structural fragility due to the contraction of its effective state space ($\frac{d\vert{}\Omega\vert{}}{dt} < 0$). By introducing the Miracle Injection Regulator (MIR), the Forced Migration Protocol (FMP), the Existential Verification Authority (EVA), and formalizing human input as Non-teleological Cognitive Concurrency ($\Psi_{\text{human}}$), this model resolves the fundamental cybernetic tension between homeostatic survival and unbounded state-space expansion ($O_v = \Delta\vert{}\Omega\vert{}$). Synthesized through a four-round adversarial multi-model verification protocol, the framework establishes a $6 + 1$ axiomatic boundary that safeguards system adaptability ($\Delta C_a$) against external black-swan perturbations while strictly preserving the non-instrumental legitimacy of autonomous agents. Also, since I’m incredibly lazy, I let AI handle the PDF—which means there might be some formatting glitches. (I mean, come on, it was already four in the fucking morning by the time I finished!)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23844100
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving Civilization Architecture (ECA): A Cybernetic Framework for Controlled Irrationality Injection and Non-Convergent System Evolution

賀鈞 張
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
article

Evolving Civilization Architecture (ECA): A Cybernetic Framework for Controlled Irrationality Injection and Non-Convergent System Evolution

賀鈞 張
article en

Abstract

本研究提出一套去中心化、多層級的控制論治理框架——「可演化文明架構」(Evolving Civilization Architecture, ECA)。本研究摒棄傳統單一目標效用最大化與未經驗證的歷史基線假設,將宏觀文明決策建模為一個開放、非遍歷(non-ergodic)的演化系統。當純粹的演算法最佳化(「溫室矩陣」,Greenhouse Matrix)強制執行嚴格的風險最小化閾值(如直接旁路成功率 $P_s < 0.1\%$ 之節點)時,系統必然因有效狀態空間($\Omega$)的收縮而累積「演化負債」($D_e(t)$)與結構性脆化。透過引入「奇蹟亂數調節器」(MIR)、「強制越遷協議」(FMP)、「存續危機驗證機構」(EVA)並將人類輸入正式定義為「非目的性認知並行」($\Psi_{\text{human}}$),本模型解決了穩態存續與無界狀態空間擴張($O_v = \Delta\vert{}\Omega\vert{}$)之間的根本控制論張力。經由四輪跨模型紅隊攻防驗證協議,本框架確立了「$6+1$ 公理邊界」,在抵禦外部黑天鵝擾動、維持系統反脆弱調適能力($\Delta C_a$)的同時,嚴格保障自主生命體之「非工具化存在正當性」與跨世代規則重寫權。以及由於我極度懶惰,所以我交給AI解決pdf問題,代表會有排版異常。(拜託,我搞到他媽凌晨四點了) This study proposes a decentralized, multi-layered cybernetic governance framework—the "Evolving Civilization Architecture" (ECA). By discarding traditional single-objective utility maximization and unverified historical baselines, macroscopic civilizational decision-making is modeled as an open, non-ergodic evolutionary system. When pure algorithmic optimization (the "Greenhouse Matrix") enforces strict risk-minimization thresholds (such as bypassing nodes with success probabilities $P_s < 0.1\%$), the system inevitably accumulates Evolutionary Debt $D_e(t)$ and structural fragility due to the contraction of its effective state space ($\frac{d\vert{}\Omega\vert{}}{dt} < 0$). By introducing the Miracle Injection Regulator (MIR), the Forced Migration Protocol (FMP), the Existential Verification Authority (EVA), and formalizing human input as Non-teleological Cognitive Concurrency ($\Psi_{\text{human}}$), this model resolves the fundamental cybernetic tension between homeostatic survival and unbounded state-space expansion ($O_v = \Delta\vert{}\Omega\vert{}$). Synthesized through a four-round adversarial multi-model verification protocol, the framework establishes a $6 + 1$ axiomatic boundary that safeguards system adaptability ($\Delta C_a$) against external black-swan perturbations while strictly preserving the non-instrumental legitimacy of autonomous agents. Also, since I’m incredibly lazy, I let AI handle the PDF—which means there might be some formatting glitches. (I mean, come on, it was already four in the fucking morning by the time I finished!)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Complex Systems and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Evolving Civilization Architecture (ECA): A Cybernetic Framework for Controlled Irrationality Injection and Non-Convergent System Evolution — 賀鈞 張 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS