The Intensity of an Experience Does Not Prove Its Value / La intensidad de una experiencia no demuestra su valor

ENGLISH An intense experience can have profound personal meaning without, on that basis alone, demonstrating functional benefit, a causal mechanism, or generalizable efficacy. This interdisciplinary conceptual essay distinguishes three inferential transitions: from lived experience to benefit, from observed improvement to causal attribution, and from an individual case to a general rule. It compares these transitions across bodily, contemplative, and creative experiences, drawing on a focused selection of research on emotional memory, meaning-making, perceived personal growth, interoception, challenging meditation experiences, and the feeling of insight. Five guiding questions are offered to clarify the type of claim and the evidence it would require. These questions do not constitute an original or validated measurement instrument. The essay discusses conceptual and evidentiary limits; it reports no new experiments or clinical findings. Version 1. English and Spanish editions deposited together. ESPAÑOL Una experiencia intensa puede poseer un significado personal profundo sin que esa intensidad demuestre por sí sola un beneficio funcional, un mecanismo causal o una eficacia generalizable. Este ensayo conceptual interdisciplinar distingue tres transiciones inferenciales: de la vivencia al beneficio, de la mejoría observada a la atribución causal y del caso individual a la regla general. Examina esas transiciones en los ámbitos corporal, contemplativo y creativo, a partir de una selección focalizada de estudios sobre memoria emocional, construcción de significado, crecimiento personal percibido, interocepción, experiencias meditativas difíciles y sensación de descubrimiento. Propone cinco preguntas para precisar el tipo de afirmación y la evidencia necesaria. No constituyen un instrumento de medida original ni validado. El ensayo analiza límites conceptuales y probatorios; no presenta nuevos experimentos ni resultados clínicos. Versión 1. Ediciones inglesa y española depositadas juntas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23842378
Primary Topic
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intensity of an Experience Does Not Prove Its Value / La intensidad de una experiencia no demuestra su valor

Juan Segurola
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
article

The Intensity of an Experience Does Not Prove Its Value / La intensidad de una experiencia no demuestra su valor

Juan Segurola
article en

Abstract

ENGLISH An intense experience can have profound personal meaning without, on that basis alone, demonstrating functional benefit, a causal mechanism, or generalizable efficacy. This interdisciplinary conceptual essay distinguishes three inferential transitions: from lived experience to benefit, from observed improvement to causal attribution, and from an individual case to a general rule. It compares these transitions across bodily, contemplative, and creative experiences, drawing on a focused selection of research on emotional memory, meaning-making, perceived personal growth, interoception, challenging meditation experiences, and the feeling of insight. Five guiding questions are offered to clarify the type of claim and the evidence it would require. These questions do not constitute an original or validated measurement instrument. The essay discusses conceptual and evidentiary limits; it reports no new experiments or clinical findings. Version 1. English and Spanish editions deposited together. ESPAÑOL Una experiencia intensa puede poseer un significado personal profundo sin que esa intensidad demuestre por sí sola un beneficio funcional, un mecanismo causal o una eficacia generalizable. Este ensayo conceptual interdisciplinar distingue tres transiciones inferenciales: de la vivencia al beneficio, de la mejoría observada a la atribución causal y del caso individual a la regla general. Examina esas transiciones en los ámbitos corporal, contemplativo y creativo, a partir de una selección focalizada de estudios sobre memoria emocional, construcción de significado, crecimiento personal percibido, interocepción, experiencias meditativas difíciles y sensación de descubrimiento. Propone cinco preguntas para precisar el tipo de afirmación y la evidencia necesaria. No constituyen un instrumento de medida original ni validado. El ensayo analiza límites conceptuales y probatorios; no presenta nuevos experimentos ni resultados clínicos. Versión 1. Ediciones inglesa y española depositadas juntas.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon