Generative AI in Professional Learning at a Chinese Private Vocational College: Student Experiences and Teacher Perspectives

GenAI is now part of ordinary study for many students, but frequent use does not automatically mean deeper learning. This mixed-methods study examined professional-course use of GenAI at a private vocational college in Jiangxi Province, China. The evidence came from 431 student questionnaires and written responses from 18 teachers. After response-quality screening, 184 cases were retained for the primary quantitative analyses; 203 moderately screened cases and the full 431 responses were used for sensitivity checks. Meaningful learning engagement (MLE) was measured with two items and is therefore treated as a brief indicator of cognitive engagement rather than a validated multidimensional scale. Students reported using GenAI most often for knowledge clarification (82.6%) and coursework or exercises (74.5%); practical-training use was lower (20.7%). Perceived professional value (PPV) was associated with MLE (β = .550). When PPV and MLE were entered together, both remained associated with post-adoption learning experience (PAE; β = .339 and β = .364, respectively). The standardized indirect association from PPV to PAE through MLE was .200, with a 95% bootstrap CI of [.109, .307]. These cross-sectional results describe associations rather than causal effects. Teacher accounts added important context. Teachers valued GenAI for quick explanations but also described answer-oriented use, inaccurate professional content, weak links with practical training, and uncertainty about institutional guidance. They wanted more discipline-specific examples, clearer expectations, and assessment that made student reasoning visible. Across both strands, three tensions stood out: efficiency versus engagement, general usefulness versus professional fit, and rapid student adoption versus slower institutional response. Because the evidence came from one college, the findings should be interpreted as context-specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v3i5.718
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Professional Learning at a Chinese Private Vocational College: Student Experiences and Teacher Perspectives

Chen Wang
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Generative AI in Professional Learning at a Chinese Private Vocational College: Student Experiences and Teacher Perspectives

Chen Wang
article en

Abstract

GenAI is now part of ordinary study for many students, but frequent use does not automatically mean deeper learning. This mixed-methods study examined professional-course use of GenAI at a private vocational college in Jiangxi Province, China. The evidence came from 431 student questionnaires and written responses from 18 teachers. After response-quality screening, 184 cases were retained for the primary quantitative analyses; 203 moderately screened cases and the full 431 responses were used for sensitivity checks. Meaningful learning engagement (MLE) was measured with two items and is therefore treated as a brief indicator of cognitive engagement rather than a validated multidimensional scale. Students reported using GenAI most often for knowledge clarification (82.6%) and coursework or exercises (74.5%); practical-training use was lower (20.7%). Perceived professional value (PPV) was associated with MLE (β = .550). When PPV and MLE were entered together, both remained associated with post-adoption learning experience (PAE; β = .339 and β = .364, respectively). The standardized indirect association from PPV to PAE through MLE was .200, with a 95% bootstrap CI of [.109, .307]. These cross-sectional results describe associations rather than causal effects. Teacher accounts added important context. Teachers valued GenAI for quick explanations but also described answer-oriented use, inaccurate professional content, weak links with practical training, and uncertainty about institutional guidance. They wanted more discipline-specific examples, clearer expectations, and assessment that made student reasoning visible. Across both strands, three tensions stood out: efficiency versus engagement, general usefulness versus professional fit, and rapid student adoption versus slower institutional response. Because the evidence came from one college, the findings should be interpreted as context-specific.

International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 3(5)
Jiangxi Fenglin College of Foreign Economy and Trade (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Generative AI in Professional Learning at a Chinese Private Vocational College: Student Experiences and Teacher Perspectives — Chen Wang · International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS