A prospective study of perioperative factors for wound dehiscence in elective surgeries

Background: Wound dehiscence – the partial or complete separation of surgical wound edges – is a serious post-operative complication causing prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity, and occasional mortality. Although extensively studied in emergency laparotomies, data on modifiable perioperative risk factors in elective surgery remain limited. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative and intraoperative risk factors for wound dehiscence in elective surgeries, and to assess the association of nutritional status, infection, incision type, suture material, and closure technique with its occurrence. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 301 patients aged 18–65 years undergoing elective general surgical procedures at a tertiary care center from July 2024 to February 2026. Perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed against the occurrence of wound dehiscence using the Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v21, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Wound dehiscence occurred in 17 patients (5.6%). Intraoperative contamination (29.4% vs. 16.2%, P=0.18) and anemia (<11 g/dL; 41.2% vs. 31.0%, P=0.42) were more frequent among patients with dehiscence, and males were over-represented (82.4% vs. 58.5%, P=0.07), but none of these associations reached statistical significance. Hypoalbuminemia (17.6% vs. 37.7%, P=0.12), diabetes mellitus (17.6% vs. 20.4%, P=1.00), operative duration >150 min (29.4% vs. 27.1%, P=0.79), age, incision type, suture material, and closure technique showed no association with wound dehiscence. Conclusion: In this optimized elective surgical cohort, wound dehiscence was uncommon (5.6%) and no single perioperative factorwas independently predictive, suggesting that routine pre-operative correction of anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperglycemia may attenuate the risk conventionally attributed to these factors. Larger studies are needed to confirm the trends observed for intraoperative contamination and male sex.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i11.5595
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective study of perioperative factors for wound dehiscence in elective surgeries

Adarsh Dandey, Agarwal Pushpendra, Nishant Saurabh Saxena, Maurya RK et al.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Surgical site infection prevention
article

A prospective study of perioperative factors for wound dehiscence in elective surgeries

Adarsh Dandey, Agarwal Pushpendra, Nishant Saurabh Saxena, Maurya RK, Rahul Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Wound dehiscence – the partial or complete separation of surgical wound edges – is a serious post-operative complication causing prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity, and occasional mortality. Although extensively studied in emergency laparotomies, data on modifiable perioperative risk factors in elective surgery remain limited. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative and intraoperative risk factors for wound dehiscence in elective surgeries, and to assess the association of nutritional status, infection, incision type, suture material, and closure technique with its occurrence. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 301 patients aged 18–65 years undergoing elective general surgical procedures at a tertiary care center from July 2024 to February 2026. Perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed against the occurrence of wound dehiscence using the Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v21, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Wound dehiscence occurred in 17 patients (5.6%). Intraoperative contamination (29.4% vs. 16.2%, P=0.18) and anemia (<11 g/dL; 41.2% vs. 31.0%, P=0.42) were more frequent among patients with dehiscence, and males were over-represented (82.4% vs. 58.5%, P=0.07), but none of these associations reached statistical significance. Hypoalbuminemia (17.6% vs. 37.7%, P=0.12), diabetes mellitus (17.6% vs. 20.4%, P=1.00), operative duration >150 min (29.4% vs. 27.1%, P=0.79), age, incision type, suture material, and closure technique showed no association with wound dehiscence. Conclusion: In this optimized elective surgical cohort, wound dehiscence was uncommon (5.6%) and no single perioperative factorwas independently predictive, suggesting that routine pre-operative correction of anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperglycemia may attenuate the risk conventionally attributed to these factors. Larger studies are needed to confirm the trends observed for intraoperative contamination and male sex.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon