Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal

Abstract Background Peer relationships are an important indicator of adolescents’ school-based mental health and social adjustment, but experimental evidence on whether cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) improves them remains limited. This trial tested the effect of a CEPA curriculum on peer relationships relative to a traditional physical education curriculum (TPEC), with exploratory pathways through executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Methods In this parallel two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, 12 intact classes comprising 650 students in grades 10 and 11 from three urban public high schools in eastern China were randomly assigned within school-by-grade strata to 12 weeks of CEPA or TPEC (three 45-min sessions per week; six classes per arm). The primary outcome was the posttest total peer relationship score; secondary outcomes were executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, using linear mixed models with class random intercepts and multiple imputation; serial mediation was examined in exploratory analyses with Monte Carlo confidence intervals. Results 650 students entered baseline assessment (CEPA, 327; TPEC, 323) and 612 (94.2%) completed the posttest. CEPA improved peer relationships relative to TPEC (between-group difference, 4.39 points; 95% CI, 0.64 to 8.13; d = 0.38; p = 0.029). Between-group differences for executive function (2.28; 95% CI, − 0.22 to 4.79; d = 0.35) and cognitive reappraisal (1.38; 95% CI, − 0.13 to 2.90; d = 0.36) were not statistically significant after Holm correction. Exploratory indirect-effect estimates through executive function, cognitive reappraisal, and their serial pathway were positive, with 95% confidence intervals that included zero. The primary result was consistent across sensitivity analyses, and observed contamination in TPEC classes was 2.3% of sessions. Conclusions A 12-week CEPA curriculum improved adolescents’ peer relationships relative to traditional physical education. Executive function and cognitive reappraisal remain candidate pathways for further testing. CEPA offers a practical approach within routine school physical education. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114337 (retrospectively registered 10 December 2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-30161-x
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal

Yifan Shi, Wange Wang, Yifan Xu, Kaiqiang Zhong et al.
BMC Public Health
Physical Activity and Health
article

Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on peer relationships among adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial exploring the roles of executive function and cognitive reappraisal

Yifan Shi, Wange Wang, Yifan Xu, Kaiqiang Zhong, Shimeng Wang, Wanqi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Peer relationships are an important indicator of adolescents’ school-based mental health and social adjustment, but experimental evidence on whether cognitively engaging physical activity (CEPA) improves them remains limited. This trial tested the effect of a CEPA curriculum on peer relationships relative to a traditional physical education curriculum (TPEC), with exploratory pathways through executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Methods In this parallel two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, 12 intact classes comprising 650 students in grades 10 and 11 from three urban public high schools in eastern China were randomly assigned within school-by-grade strata to 12 weeks of CEPA or TPEC (three 45-min sessions per week; six classes per arm). The primary outcome was the posttest total peer relationship score; secondary outcomes were executive function and cognitive reappraisal. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, using linear mixed models with class random intercepts and multiple imputation; serial mediation was examined in exploratory analyses with Monte Carlo confidence intervals. Results 650 students entered baseline assessment (CEPA, 327; TPEC, 323) and 612 (94.2%) completed the posttest. CEPA improved peer relationships relative to TPEC (between-group difference, 4.39 points; 95% CI, 0.64 to 8.13; d = 0.38; p = 0.029). Between-group differences for executive function (2.28; 95% CI, − 0.22 to 4.79; d = 0.35) and cognitive reappraisal (1.38; 95% CI, − 0.13 to 2.90; d = 0.36) were not statistically significant after Holm correction. Exploratory indirect-effect estimates through executive function, cognitive reappraisal, and their serial pathway were positive, with 95% confidence intervals that included zero. The primary result was consistent across sensitivity analyses, and observed contamination in TPEC classes was 2.3% of sessions. Conclusions A 12-week CEPA curriculum improved adolescents’ peer relationships relative to traditional physical education. Executive function and cognitive reappraisal remain candidate pathways for further testing. CEPA offers a practical approach within routine school physical education. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500114337 (retrospectively registered 10 December 2025).

BMC Public Health
Nantong University (CN), Nanjing Sport Institute (CN), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon