Typing Rhythms Beyond the Latin Script: An Amharic–English Keystroke Dynamics Benchmark

Keystroke dynamics---the timing of a person's key presses and releases---is a low-cost, non-intrusive behavioral biometric. However, public benchmarks and most empirical evidence focus on typing in Latin scripts, predominantly English, and do not cover speakers of Ge'ez-script (Ethiopic) languages such as Amharic, which has more than 35 million native speakers. Ethiopic syllabic characters are commonly entered through multi-key transliteration, creating different motor-planning demands. This raises the question of whether timing-based verification methods developed for Latin scripts transfer effectively to other writing systems. We present and characterize a keystroke dynamics corpus collected from a shared pool of typists completing three text-entry tasks---fixed text, free text, and password entry---in Amharic and English. The corpus contains 114,955 labeled keystroke events across five sub-corpora (4,751--51,813 rows each), with up to 25 raw and derived timing fields per event. We report a systematic exploratory data analysis (EDA) covering structural composition; missingness and duplication; demographic and skill-level coverage; univariate and bivariate timing distributions; feature redundancy (correlation and hierarchical clustering); per-user sample imbalance; and user distinguishability in Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) projections. The analysis finds strongly right-skewed timing features, a small number of algebraically redundant feature pairs, a coefficient of variation in per-user sample counts of up to 2.4, and substantial visual overlap between users in low-dimensional projections. Together, these properties plausibly explain the 40--60% rank-1 accuracy and 10--20% equal error rate (EER) previously obtained with baseline classifiers on this cohort. Based on these diagnostics and recent literature, we recommend feature engineering, session- and user-aware evaluation protocols, and careful model selection for keystroke biometrics in low-resource, non-Latin-script settings. We also make the EDA pipeline available for benchmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of tri-modal keystroke dynamics data in an Ethiopic-script language, providing a reference point for cross-lingual and cross-script research in behavioral biometrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Data Science
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds0228
Primary Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typing Rhythms Beyond the Latin Script: An Amharic–English Keystroke Dynamics Benchmark

Asrat Mulatu Beyene, Wongel Dawit Daniel, Animaw Kerie Aseres, Lemlem Kassa Tegegne
Journal of Behavioral Data Science
User Authentication and Security Systems
article

Typing Rhythms Beyond the Latin Script: An Amharic–English Keystroke Dynamics Benchmark

Asrat Mulatu Beyene, Wongel Dawit Daniel, Animaw Kerie Aseres, Lemlem Kassa Tegegne
article en

Abstract

Keystroke dynamics---the timing of a person's key presses and releases---is a low-cost, non-intrusive behavioral biometric. However, public benchmarks and most empirical evidence focus on typing in Latin scripts, predominantly English, and do not cover speakers of Ge'ez-script (Ethiopic) languages such as Amharic, which has more than 35 million native speakers. Ethiopic syllabic characters are commonly entered through multi-key transliteration, creating different motor-planning demands. This raises the question of whether timing-based verification methods developed for Latin scripts transfer effectively to other writing systems. We present and characterize a keystroke dynamics corpus collected from a shared pool of typists completing three text-entry tasks---fixed text, free text, and password entry---in Amharic and English. The corpus contains 114,955 labeled keystroke events across five sub-corpora (4,751--51,813 rows each), with up to 25 raw and derived timing fields per event. We report a systematic exploratory data analysis (EDA) covering structural composition; missingness and duplication; demographic and skill-level coverage; univariate and bivariate timing distributions; feature redundancy (correlation and hierarchical clustering); per-user sample imbalance; and user distinguishability in Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) projections. The analysis finds strongly right-skewed timing features, a small number of algebraically redundant feature pairs, a coefficient of variation in per-user sample counts of up to 2.4, and substantial visual overlap between users in low-dimensional projections. Together, these properties plausibly explain the 40--60% rank-1 accuracy and 10--20% equal error rate (EER) previously obtained with baseline classifiers on this cohort. Based on these diagnostics and recent literature, we recommend feature engineering, session- and user-aware evaluation protocols, and careful model selection for keystroke biometrics in low-resource, non-Latin-script settings. We also make the EDA pipeline available for benchmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of tri-modal keystroke dynamics data in an Ethiopic-script language, providing a reference point for cross-lingual and cross-script research in behavioral biometrics.

Journal of Behavioral Data ScienceVol. 7(1)
Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), Carnegie Mellon University Africa (RW), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
User Authentication and Security Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon