Assessing climate change impacts on wetlands inundation: a comparison of multiple regression and artificial neural networks hybrid models

Wetlands are highly vulnerable to climate-driven hydrological changes, particularly in semi-arid Mediterranean regions. This study evaluated the impact of climate change on wetland inundated area by comparing two hybrid modelling approaches: a multiple linear regression approach (MULREG) and a nonlinear autoregressive neural network with exogenous inputs (NARX). Both integrate aquifer discharge data from a physics-based groundwater flow model (MODFLOW). The framework combines Landsat-derived inundation images (1984–2015), produced via supervised near-infrared classification, hydroclimatological drivers, and derived variables, including potential evapotranspiration, effective precipitation, and aquifer discharge. Although some NARX realizations achieved lower prediction errors than MULREG, the average performance across all realizations was comparable or slightly poorer, suggesting no clear model superiority. Future scenarios were generated using a delta-change method driven by an ensemble of ISIMIP GCM projections under multiple RCPs, sampling uncertainty via + 1 °C and + 3 °C warming levels, and contrasting regional precipitation changes. Scenario propagation revealed significant differences between the models: MULREG produced comparatively muted reductions in wetland inundated area, even under severe hydroclimatic shifts, whereas NARX yielded a stronger response to projected changes in the hydroclimatological drivers and produced results that were more consistent with the sensitivities observed during the historical period. Under the most extreme scenario (+ 3 °C with reduced precipitation), the mean inundated area decreased by ~ 28% (from 4.31 km² to 3.09 km²), with larger reductions under dry conditions. The results highlight the need for appropriate model selection when translating climate scenarios into wetland responses and support the use of nonlinear memory-aware models for groundwater-dependent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Water Science
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-026-03009-3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing climate change impacts on wetlands inundation: a comparison of multiple regression and artificial neural networks hybrid models

Rosario Jiménez‐Espinosa, Antonio‐Juan Collados‐Lara, Leticia Baena-Ruíz, David Pulido‐Velazquez et al.
Applied Water Science
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Assessing climate change impacts on wetlands inundation: a comparison of multiple regression and artificial neural networks hybrid models

Rosario Jiménez‐Espinosa, Antonio‐Juan Collados‐Lara, Leticia Baena-Ruíz, David Pulido‐Velazquez, Eulogio Pardo‐Igúzquiza, Miguel Bruno Mejías, Héctor Aguilera, Juan-de-Dios Gómez-Gómez, Juan Grima
article en

Abstract

Wetlands are highly vulnerable to climate-driven hydrological changes, particularly in semi-arid Mediterranean regions. This study evaluated the impact of climate change on wetland inundated area by comparing two hybrid modelling approaches: a multiple linear regression approach (MULREG) and a nonlinear autoregressive neural network with exogenous inputs (NARX). Both integrate aquifer discharge data from a physics-based groundwater flow model (MODFLOW). The framework combines Landsat-derived inundation images (1984–2015), produced via supervised near-infrared classification, hydroclimatological drivers, and derived variables, including potential evapotranspiration, effective precipitation, and aquifer discharge. Although some NARX realizations achieved lower prediction errors than MULREG, the average performance across all realizations was comparable or slightly poorer, suggesting no clear model superiority. Future scenarios were generated using a delta-change method driven by an ensemble of ISIMIP GCM projections under multiple RCPs, sampling uncertainty via + 1 °C and + 3 °C warming levels, and contrasting regional precipitation changes. Scenario propagation revealed significant differences between the models: MULREG produced comparatively muted reductions in wetland inundated area, even under severe hydroclimatic shifts, whereas NARX yielded a stronger response to projected changes in the hydroclimatological drivers and produced results that were more consistent with the sensitivities observed during the historical period. Under the most extreme scenario (+ 3 °C with reduced precipitation), the mean inundated area decreased by ~ 28% (from 4.31 km² to 3.09 km²), with larger reductions under dry conditions. The results highlight the need for appropriate model selection when translating climate scenarios into wetland responses and support the use of nonlinear memory-aware models for groundwater-dependent systems.

Applied Water Science
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Universidad de Jaén (ES), Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (ES), Instituto de Geociencias (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon