A Constitutional Syscall Architecture for Cyber-Physical Control Systems

This paper specifies a constitutional programming architecture for cyber-physical control. An effect-pure computational core proposes world-touching operations; a boundary evaluates them against scoped authority, versioned constraints, current context, and timing obligations. Actuation, sensing, time, persistence, and communication become explicit constitutional crossings rather than ambient privileges. The central correction is that admissibility is not execution. A complete effect lifecycle distinguishes proposal, admission, dispatch, device acceptance, physical observation, and evidentiary standing. An authorization receipt proves only that a named policy state admitted a request. It does not prove that a driver accepted it, an actuator moved, the intended physical effect occurred, or the surrounding world remained safe. Cyber-physical governance therefore requires typed receipts, independent observations, bounded unknown states, non-bypassability evidence over the whole trusted computing base, and an emergency path that does not depend on the ordinary adjudicator remaining healthy. The architecture is presented as a proposal and evaluation program, not as demonstrated safety, real-time performance, replay equivalence, certification, or standards conformance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23847355
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Constitutional Syscall Architecture for Cyber-Physical Control Systems

Adam Ableman
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Access Control and Trust
article

A Constitutional Syscall Architecture for Cyber-Physical Control Systems

Adam Ableman
article en

Abstract

This paper specifies a constitutional programming architecture for cyber-physical control. An effect-pure computational core proposes world-touching operations; a boundary evaluates them against scoped authority, versioned constraints, current context, and timing obligations. Actuation, sensing, time, persistence, and communication become explicit constitutional crossings rather than ambient privileges. The central correction is that admissibility is not execution. A complete effect lifecycle distinguishes proposal, admission, dispatch, device acceptance, physical observation, and evidentiary standing. An authorization receipt proves only that a named policy state admitted a request. It does not prove that a driver accepted it, an actuator moved, the intended physical effect occurred, or the surrounding world remained safe. Cyber-physical governance therefore requires typed receipts, independent observations, bounded unknown states, non-bypassability evidence over the whole trusted computing base, and an emergency path that does not depend on the ordinary adjudicator remaining healthy. The architecture is presented as a proposal and evaluation program, not as demonstrated safety, real-time performance, replay equivalence, certification, or standards conformance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Access Control and Trust
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A Constitutional Syscall Architecture for Cyber-Physical Control Systems — Adam Ableman · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS