Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport after Athletic Hamstring Injury: An ICCUS Society Consensus Statement

Background Athletic hamstring injuries (AHSI) remain a persistent challenge because recurrence is common and clinical decisions often depend on incomplete evidence. This consensus statement is intended to give clinicians a practical, unified framework for classification, rehabilitation, and return to sport after athletic hamstring injury. The purpose of this study was to achieve expert consensus on the management of athletic hamstring injuries through a structured, scientific survey approach. Study Design Delphi Survey Methods A modified Delphi process, aligned with CREDES guidelines, was conducted with an expert panel of sports physical therapists identified as having specific expertise in AHSI from the ICCUS Society. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 80% agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Statements addressed three areas: AHSI examination and classification, rehabilitation and management, and return to sport (RTS) testing. Results Sixty statements were developed across three domains. Seventeen experienced clinicians completed the final round. Overall, 54 statements reached consensus, with a mean Likert score of 4.56 ± 0.37 out of 5 (strongly agree), and mean agreement of 89.88% ± 12.1%. Experts supported standardized terminology, MRI and the use of diagnostic ultrasound for diagnosis when appropriate, individualized and criterion-based rehabilitation, progressive tissue loading and length restoration, early neuromuscular control, gradual running and agility progression, progression to pain-free sprinting, objective strength assessment, sport-specific workloads, and athlete readiness as key RTS criteria. Discussion The findings emphasize active rehabilitation guided by measurable progress rather than reliance on fixed thresholds. Clinicians should combine injury classification, functional presentation, symptom response, objective testing, sport demands, and athlete confidence when advancing rehabilitation and making RTS decisions. Conclusion This ICCUS Society consensus statement offers a practical roadmap for managing AHSI: classify clearly, load progressively, monitor symptoms, test objectively, and return athletes only when sport-specific running, sprinting, strength, training tolerance, and readiness align. Level of Evidence 4

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.172912
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport after Athletic Hamstring Injury: An ICCUS Society Consensus Statement

Robert C. Manske, Kevin E. Wilk, Pete Draovitch, Bob Mangine et al.
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport after Athletic Hamstring Injury: An ICCUS Society Consensus Statement

Robert C. Manske, Kevin E. Wilk, Pete Draovitch, Bob Mangine, Leigh Weiss, Michael L. Voight, Phil Page, Terry Malone, Timothy F. Tyler, Holly Silver-Granelli, Brandon Gilliam
article en

Abstract

Background Athletic hamstring injuries (AHSI) remain a persistent challenge because recurrence is common and clinical decisions often depend on incomplete evidence. This consensus statement is intended to give clinicians a practical, unified framework for classification, rehabilitation, and return to sport after athletic hamstring injury. The purpose of this study was to achieve expert consensus on the management of athletic hamstring injuries through a structured, scientific survey approach. Study Design Delphi Survey Methods A modified Delphi process, aligned with CREDES guidelines, was conducted with an expert panel of sports physical therapists identified as having specific expertise in AHSI from the ICCUS Society. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 80% agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Statements addressed three areas: AHSI examination and classification, rehabilitation and management, and return to sport (RTS) testing. Results Sixty statements were developed across three domains. Seventeen experienced clinicians completed the final round. Overall, 54 statements reached consensus, with a mean Likert score of 4.56 ± 0.37 out of 5 (strongly agree), and mean agreement of 89.88% ± 12.1%. Experts supported standardized terminology, MRI and the use of diagnostic ultrasound for diagnosis when appropriate, individualized and criterion-based rehabilitation, progressive tissue loading and length restoration, early neuromuscular control, gradual running and agility progression, progression to pain-free sprinting, objective strength assessment, sport-specific workloads, and athlete readiness as key RTS criteria. Discussion The findings emphasize active rehabilitation guided by measurable progress rather than reliance on fixed thresholds. Clinicians should combine injury classification, functional presentation, symptom response, objective testing, sport demands, and athlete confidence when advancing rehabilitation and making RTS decisions. Conclusion This ICCUS Society consensus statement offers a practical roadmap for managing AHSI: classify clearly, load progressively, monitor symptoms, test objectively, and return athletes only when sport-specific running, sprinting, strength, training tolerance, and readiness align. Level of Evidence 4

International Journal of Sports Physical TherapyVol. 21(11)
University of Kentucky (US), Wichita State University (US), Ascension Via Christi (US), Belmont University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon